Orange County NC Website
1 <br />INFORMATION ITEM <br />PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT <br />Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director <br />Administration „mow 131 W. Margaret Lane <br />(919) 245 -2575 Suite 101 <br />(919) 644 -3002 (FAX) III' III NIVVVVVV P O. Box 8181 <br />www.orangecountync.gov 111 ;1°1 I C. 1 1: LV,1i . Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Planning & Inspections Director <br />DATE: February 25, 2015 <br />SUBJECT: "The Edge" Proposed Development Project in the Town of Chapel <br />Hill's Planning Jurisdiction <br />PURPOSE: To receive a planning based report on a proposed development project <br />known as "The Edge" located in the Town of Chapel Hill's planning jurisdiction on <br />Eubanks Road at Southwest corner of Interstate 40 and MLK Blvd. <br />NOTE: The Chapel Hill Town Council approved this project on onda�, February 23, <br />2015. The newspaper and staff report that Northwood Ravin (developer of `The Edge') <br />wants the Town's help to pay for $3.5 million of road improvements by a later <br />development agreement. We have not been contacted to date regarding participation. <br />BACKGROUND: The review of this project was originally based in the Joint Planning <br />Area planning courtesy review process area. We have corresponded with Chapel Hill <br />staff over the last few months. Although economic development and finance are familiar <br />with the proposal, their direct involvement was not requested at this stage. The Town of <br />Chapel Hill has received a Special Use Permit (SUP) application for a proposed <br />development project known as "The Edge" located on 53.75 acres on Eubanks Road at <br />the Interstate 40 off ramp. Portions of the project were located in Chapel Hill's JPA <br />Transition Area but is now part ETJ and part Town limits. The land use map is noted as <br />"Mixed Use - Office Emphasis" in this area. County planning staff has determined the <br />proposed project is generally consistent with this land use classification if the project is <br />predominantly non - residential. The prior JPA land use text did not have percentages of <br />the mix but described this as an "Office /Institutional Area ". <br />The application materials state that current market demands in this suburban location <br />limit the ability to bring the project to fruition if office is to be the predominant use. The <br />zoning code and Special Use Permit process employed for this project offers a great <br />deal of project mix (i.e. amount of non - residential versus residential) flexibility. The <br />application proposes the following minimum and maximum use percentages: <br />