Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 7:56:31 AM
Creation date
2/27/2015 12:02:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-03-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 E. Public Transit Element of the Plan <br /> 3 Existing Transit Service Serving the Study Area <br /> 4 Orange County Planning Comment—Additional Transit Service <br /> 5 o Enhanced bus element network : <br /> 6 • A circulator shuttle that would provide service to: <br /> 7 o Downtown Chapel Hill <br /> 8 o The UNC Campus and future Carolina North <br /> 9 • An adjusted OPT 420 bus route: <br /> 10 o Rural Orange County & Hillsborough <br /> 11 o Consider dedicated BRT lanes — as identified by Kimley Horn Traffic Analysis <br /> 12 2/18/2011, page 1.26 and 1.4 <br /> 13 o High-order Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) <br /> 14 Walkability <br /> 15 Multi-modal Aspects <br /> 16 Future bus tie-in Light Rail <br /> 17 <br /> 18 F. Planned Roadway Improvements and General Comments in the Study Area <br /> 19 Positive <br /> 20 Fordham Blvd (US 15-501) corridor is congested <br /> 21 Need for investment <br /> 22 Improvements are typically funded through DCHC-MPO <br /> 23 Some programmed <br /> 24 MPO recently (Nov. 2014) approved $2.17 million Ephesus-Fordham intersection <br /> 25 improvement which decreases $8.8 million S-TI F estimate <br /> 26 Negative <br /> 27 S-TIF or other Funding for roads is not a county function, however, participation in the <br /> 28 prioritization of MPO projects is <br /> 29 State TIP/NCDOT Collaboration <br /> 30 Positive <br /> 31 Mixed Use Project <br /> 32 Internal trip capture <br /> 33 Decrease typical external trip generation <br /> 34 Negative <br /> 35 Stronger bus transit attributes <br /> 36 Downtown/college area integration (i.e. cross town shopping) <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Recommendations <br /> 39 Building a Transit Infrastructure <br /> 40 Fund a study to review: <br /> 41 1. Circulator shuttle, <br /> 42 2. OPT 420 bus route adjustment (regional tie-in), and <br /> 43 3. Future BRT in corridor. <br /> 44 BRIP amendments to help fund above transit considerations <br /> 45 Circulator shuttle <br /> 46 <br /> 47 G. Stormwater/Flood Control Elements of the Plan <br /> 48 1. Background <br /> 49 Kimley-Horn & Associates Analysis in 201 <br /> 50 2. Specific Original Work <br /> 51 3. Original Costs Estimates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.