Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 7:56:31 AM
Creation date
2/27/2015 12:02:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-03-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> 1 The Planning Department has provided its comments in Attachment C about the project; <br /> 2 specifically in regards to traffic analysis, stormwater/flood control and school impact fee <br /> 3 scenarios depending on student generation. Traffic analysis and programmed projects note how <br /> 4 some Ephesus-Fordham intersection improvements could be funded in part by Durham- Chapel <br /> 5 Hill Metropolitan Planning Organization funds. Planning recommendations also note how a <br /> 6 future transit study and Orange County Bus and Rail Investment Plan (OCBRIP) funds could be <br /> 7 used/assigned to `cross-town' routes to augment shopping opportunities between the downtown <br /> 8 area/campus and this new retail node. Chapel Hill Transit (CHT) is presently studying bus <br /> 9 routes to support future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT). <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Stormwater/flood control comments relate to how the County could participate in public <br /> 12 sponsored improvements that have multiple benefits of flood control, water quality and <br /> 13 environmental enhancement. Chapel Hill has recently (last fall) addressed a more <br /> 14 comprehensive stormwater approach than anticipated early last year. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 School impact fee potential receipts were analyzed related to the existing impact fee schedule <br /> 17 (Scenario A) vs. what new student generation rates (from a draft study completed late October <br /> 18 2014) may hypothetically generate from a student number perspective and an adjusted, yet <br /> 19 unadopted fee schedule change (Scenarios B and C). <br /> 20 A PowerPoint planning overview will be given at the meeting. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Additionally, if a new high school and/or major additions have to be made to one of the existing <br /> 23 Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) high schools to accommodate the projected <br /> 24 increase in students, the additional debt service would reduce the net amount of property taxes <br /> 25 received as a result of the planned project improvements. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 The first Ephesus Fordham performance report would be submitted during the first budget cycle <br /> 28 in which an actual tax increment from the project was expected in the next fiscal year. The <br /> 29 County could potentially benefit from participating with the Town of Chapel Hill from increased <br /> 30 property and sales tax revenues. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Based on information provided, the County would potentially receive incremental property tax <br /> 33 revenues over three phases of the Project of approximately $14 million. County expenditures, <br /> 34 based on current County financial policies and guidelines, would total $23 million prior to the <br /> 35 requested debt contribution. After paying the requested debt contribution of$400,840 over 20 <br /> 36 years, Attachment B-1 reflects Scenario 1 where the County would net a deficit of incremental <br /> 37 tax revenues of$10.4 million. This scenario includes the cost impact of providing County <br /> 38 services affected by the project, as well as the 48.1% target impact of General Fund revenues <br /> 39 provided to Education, and the costs to fund the additional students in each phase of the project <br /> 40 at the current per pupil amount of$3,571 per pupil. After paying the requested debt contribution <br /> 41 of$400,840 over 20 years, Attachment B-2 reflects Scenario 2 where the County would net a <br /> 42 deficit of incremental tax revenues of$6.9 million. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 This scenario only includes the 48.1% target to Education and the costs of the additional <br /> 45 students in each phase of the project. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 In order for the County to participate in the project without incurring a deficit, the County would <br /> 48 have to modify its financial policies in the areas of earmarking revenues for a particular purpose <br /> 49 or project, and modify its funding target for education. <br /> 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.