Orange County NC Website
3 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee said yes, he is asking about imposing a fee only on the people <br /> 2 who are currently receiving the service. <br /> 3 Michael Talbert said it would be more than the fee was two years ago, but it is hard to <br /> 4 specify. He said those people would have the option of not paying the fee or having the <br /> 5 service. He said a broad guess would be $75. <br /> 6 Commissioner McKee said this would take them back to a subscription fee. He asked if <br /> 7 it would be possible to impose this fee and have it billed out in July before the tax bills go out. <br /> 8 Michael Talbert said no. He said that window has passed, and a supplemental bill would <br /> 9 have to be mailed out in September or October. <br /> 10 Commissioner McKee asked, if it was not on a volunteer basis so people could <br /> 11 withdraw, whether it would then have the same problems as the previous 3-R fee. <br /> 12 Michael Talbert said yes. <br /> 13 Commissioner Pelissier said she is not comfortable putting a decision item on a work <br /> 14 session. She asked about putting this item on the consent agenda on June 17tH <br /> 15 Chair Jacobs said that could be done, but there would still be a decision tonight that <br /> 16 shows intent by putting it as a consent agenda item. <br /> 17 Commissioner Pelissier said the Board would only be showing intent. <br /> 18 Commissioner McKee said he agreed with Commissioner Pelissier. He does not have a <br /> 19 problem with expressing intent tonight, but he would prefer to put this on the June 17th agenda. <br /> 20 Commissioner Price arrived at 7:18 p.m. <br /> 21 Commissioner Dorosin said he does not see a problem with voting for it now, although <br /> 22 he appreciates the concern. He does not think that a consent item provides any more <br /> 23 transparency. <br /> 24 Commissioner Gordon said she wishes the Board had adopted a formula for providing <br /> 25 rural curbside recycling in April. She said considering the fairness of the situation, they should <br /> 26 o fund both rural and urban services. She said the message that needs to be sent to the towns <br /> 27 is that the County wants to be their partners. <br /> 28 Commissioner Rich said she is in favor of voting for this tonight. She understands the <br /> 29 transparency issue, and the intent is nice. She said this discussion should have happened last <br /> 30 time, and she feels it is time to correct the Board's earlier decision. She said it is important to <br /> 31 be in better communication with the towns and to make an equitable decision. <br /> 32 Commissioner Price said she assumed at the last decision point that the Chair and Vice <br /> 33 Chair had already considered this. She said the Board needs to move forward, and she would <br /> 34 be ready tonight to vote. <br /> 35 Commissioner McKee said he believes the Chair had mentioned this issue previously, <br /> 36 and this is why that option was brought in. <br /> 37 Chair Jacobs said there is a gap in communication between the entities that is no one's <br /> 38 fault. <br /> 39 Commissioner Rich said it is important to understand that if the Board goes with option <br /> 40 2, the towns need to be included in the discussion about how to replenish the solid waste <br /> 41 reserves. <br /> 42 Commissioner Pelissier said it is clear that the Board will act tonight, and she will <br /> 43 probably vote in favor of this as a way to show her support for the towns; however she does <br /> 44 want to express her discomfort of doing this action at a work session as a precedent. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Chair Jacobs said he would like to note that this is an extraordinary action to further their <br /> 49 work with the towns. <br /> 50 <br />