Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
36 <br /> 1 Paul Laughton referenced the bold note on the top of page 2 of the abstract, and he <br /> 2 said, on County projects, the replacement page is consistent with the scenario given to the <br /> 3 Board on May 15th. He reviewed the notes in the abstract regarding the Environment and <br /> 4 Agricultural Center(EAC) (CIP page 34), and the Proposed Jail(CIP page 32), which are based <br /> 5 on the discussion on May 15th <br /> 6 Paul Laughton said the Life Safety ADA (CIP page 37) has been updated to reflect <br /> 7 moving projects from years 6 -10 into years 1-5. He said the list of projects and the amounts <br /> 8 have been kept the same. <br /> 9 Commissioner Price asked about year 4 of the Life Safety/ADA page, and the fact that <br /> 10 there is nothing in year 4. <br /> 11 Paul Laughton said there are a lot of other projects already in year 4. <br /> 12 Commissioner Price said she is concerned with the fact that there are life safety issues <br /> 13 that are spread out. She asked for a rationale on delaying these issues. <br /> 14 Paul Laughton said staff attempted to prioritize by need, but these are small projects that <br /> 15 can be moved if necessary. <br /> 16 Jeff Thompson said the access priorities are in year 1 and will be completed by the end <br /> 17 of the fiscal year. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Sportsplex Projects <br /> 20 Paul Laughton said the Sportsplex (CIP pages 84-85) information has been updated, per <br /> 21 Commissioner Gordon's request, to show the debt service impact. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Paul Laughton said page 3 of the abstract contains two items that have been revised <br /> 24 based on Board action at the May 8th meeting. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 County Projects <br /> 27 Paul Laughton said one of these is the Cedar Grove Community Center(CIP page 21), <br /> 28 which looks at approving the alternate plan to add $822,000 to that center. He said the $2.8 <br /> 29 million is in year 1, and the impact will be in year 2. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Water and Sewer Projects <br /> 32 Paul Laughton said the Buckhorn EDD Phase 2—Efland Sewer to Mebane (CIP page <br /> 33 72), with the revised design costs, reflect an additional $121,400. <br /> 34 Commissioner Gordon referred to 2 lines on page 72 of the CIP, regarding a shift of <br /> 35 projects to the general fund, and she said she thought the Board had asked that no more money <br /> 36 be switched to the general fund. <br /> 37 Paul Laughton said this is for the Efland to Mebane project and this is not solid waste. <br /> 38 He said this would be paid mostly with article 46, but it was started with general fund money <br /> 39 from the Efland sewer situation. <br /> 40 Commissioner Gordon said she would like to watch this item and be mindful of <br /> 41 protecting the general fund. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Paul Laughton reviewed the following information from page 3 of the abstract: <br /> 44 <br /> 45 The following projects have been revised(changes highlighted in yellow) based <br /> 46 on the Manager's Recommended Budget for FY 2014-15 reducing the Pay-As- <br /> 47 You-Go (PAYG)funding and increasing Debt Financing a total of$770,110: <br /> 48 <br /> 49 County Projects <br /> 50 • Roofing Projects (CIP Page 28) - reflects a change of$179,010 from PAYG funding to <br /> 51 Debt Financing in Year 1. <br />