Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2008-6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008-6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:16:31 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:01:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
® Solid Waste Convenience Centers and Dropoff Sites: As a corollary to making a more <br />efficient rural residential waste collection system, RRS prepared a technical report on <br />convenience centers and dropoff sites issued in May 2007. Various options on how to <br />manage convenience centers included limiting the number of centers, charging a fee for <br />solid waste and providing more recycling opportunities at the centers. Along with this <br />was a proposal to close one or two of the least used unstaffed recycling dropoff sites to <br />improve collection efficiency. Initiating collection of corrugated cardboard at the curb <br />could further obviate the need for the extensive dropoff site system now in place. <br />Charging waste disposal fees at the convenience centers could make rural residential <br />waste collection at the house more efficient and economically attractive to the residents <br />than the currently perceived `free' convenience center system that an estimated 70% of <br />households use. Rising gasoline prices and concerns about increased carbon <br />consumption may add to this attractiveness. Adding more services such as hazardous <br />waste and rigid, bullcy plastic recycling could have the contrary effect of making the <br />centers more popular, but having fewer centers could make the trips more infrequent. The <br />Work Group has made no recommendation on these matters yet; they are pending as part <br />of the plan development. <br />The table on the next page belew summarizes the status of various solid waste management <br />issues described above and issues that remain pending and suggests areas where the Work Group <br />will face recommendation to make the draft plan complete. Items shown in ARIAL BOLD were <br />revised by SWAB in their review of the interim plan on April 3, 2008, <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.