Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2008-6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008-6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:16:31 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:01:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
both under subcontract to Olver, Inc. the County's solid waste consultant, developed a <br />series of reports on the solid waste and recycling system to assist in decision making. <br />The reports covered the following topics: <br />Review of the County's options and potential for increasing recycling to divert <br />more materials from each sub-sector -residential, multifamily and <br />commerciaUnon-residential and potential reduction and cost to each sub-sector, <br />Market-based assessment of the availability of materials processing services from <br />various private MRFs in the region compare to building apublicly-owned MRF, <br />Solicitation of information on the costs of constructing a MRF in Orange County <br />to process a larger tonnage than is now collected, possibly including UNC Chapel <br />Hill's recycling tonnage, (18,000 tons is a minimum. to make a local MRF work <br />well financially, we're at about 13,000 dry tons, UNC is at about 3,000) <br />Evaluation of the drop off site and convenience center systems and alternatives to <br />the current system, <br />Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and environmental impact of a rural <br />residential solid waste collection franchise compared to the current system of <br />convenience centers, public curbside recycling to 65% of households and private, <br />market-based, laissez-fair waste collection, <br />Evaluation of conversion of all collection programs to commingled recycling with <br />transfer to private processors from current facility including minimization of <br />current in-house materials sorting, baling and processing for market. <br />At the writing of this report, two additional studies have been presented for evaluation. <br />One is the development of various scenarios for commercial recycling and waste <br />collection including: <br />-- highly-regulated waste disposal, banning a variety of materials from disposal <br />presumably to `force' recycling with market-based private collections of waste and <br />recyclables, <br />-- franchised waste collection with recycling collections by the franchisee or public <br />sector (County), and <br />-- publicly-provided collection of recycling with a variety of public and private waste <br />collection services available on the open market. <br />The other submitted study is an evaluation of franchised waste collection throughout <br />Orange County with various combinations of jurisdictions potentially participating. The <br />study concluded that creating a franchise does not appear to have great value in reducing <br />waste collection costs within the urban areas, but may have other value through reducing <br />air emissions and other environmental impacts from collection through economies-of- <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.