Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-1994 - C-5 (b)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 05-23-94 Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-23-1994 - C-5 (b)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 3:28:02 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 3:27:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/1994
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-5 (b)
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940523
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> n��;3 <br /> FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION:Z-3-94 BOBBY KIRK <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20-SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20-SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATIONIREZONING <br /> ("Yes" indicates Compliance: "No" indicates Non-compliance) <br /> PLANNING <br /> STAFF PLANNING <br /> RECOMMENDED EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BOARD <br /> FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS <br /> Ordinance Requirements <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements <br /> specified in Article 20- <br /> Amendments. Those <br /> requirements include: <br /> 20.3.2 a) Map showing affected _x—Yes No Map provided at scale Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less than of 1"-50'. <br /> 1"–100' nor more than 1"–20'. <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description _X—Yes No Description provided with Yes No <br /> of property. application.. <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged Yes No Not applicable. Yes No <br /> error, if any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment. <br /> 4 <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, X Yes No The applicant has cited an Yes No <br /> if any, which make amendment increase in residential <br /> reasonably necessary to promote development and associated <br /> public health, safety and general commuter travel has created a <br /> welfare. need for services at this location. <br /> 20.3.2 e) Manner in which proposed _x Yes No The property is located in Yes No <br /> amendment will carry out purpose SH-4 (Orange Grove North) <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive Rural Neighborhood Activity <br /> Plan. Node. The purpose of the node <br /> is to provide small scale <br /> commercial uses serving the <br /> population in the surrounding <br /> area. The proposed zone is <br /> consistent with the Rural <br /> Neighborhood Activity Node. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.