Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-17-1994-X-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 05-17-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-17-1994-X-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 2:17:36 PM
Creation date
2/23/2015 2:17:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/17/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-B
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-30-1994 - C-2
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1994\Agenda - 06-30-94 Public Hearing
Minutes - 19940517
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
22 <br /> *• Like the RCSC page 18-19 where development is off the hichway <br /> (i.e. buffered) . This solves the issue of aesthetics. <br /> Development should be buffered wherever possible. <br /> • Because each tract is different, each area will require <br /> special study as to where and how much open space and <br /> development will occur. The current plan does not try to <br /> designate where open space should be. <br /> *• Where are the population centers going to be to support the <br /> mass transit for which we now pay $5 per car to support? <br /> There are no park and rides and no buses - except in Chapel <br /> Hill and Carrboro. <br /> *• Farmers in South Orange feel like their days are numbered. <br /> They feel like Chapel Hill residents do not want us to have <br /> cows here. <br /> *• No one option works well throughout the entire county. <br /> Different areas need varied options. Small area planning <br /> development. <br /> *• In regards to the landfill issue, some areas feel they have <br /> "been done to. " We are sensitive about this and the RCSC may <br /> be just one more thing to worry about. We have lost so much <br /> flexibility in this area (particularly Bingham and the <br /> watershed area) . <br /> Summary (group recommendations) <br /> • None recorded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.