Orange County NC Website
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
�— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - <br /> MAY-10-1994 14:37 FROM ORANGE CTY COMMISSIONERS TO PLANNING S <br /> 2 <br /> 1 remain non-urban? containing low density residential uses and allowing for the <br /> 2 extension of town water and sewer into designated open space areas serving <br /> 3 large developments or combinations of small ones which set aside significant <br /> 4 open space. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 The County charge also included the statement that such projects would <br /> 7 conform to adopted Rural Character Study guidelines. The Charge called for <br /> 8 at least 30% of the buildable area to be set aside as open space. "Buildable <br /> 9 area" was defined as the total tract area, less any rights of way for streets, <br /> 10 railroads or utility lines. This M did not include unbuildable natural <br /> 11 cultural resources such as wetlands or steep slopes. <br /> 12 The County resolution also stated that no more than two units per acre could <br /> 13 be established on the buildable acreage. The Charge adopted by Hillsborouqh <br /> 14 indicated that the 304 buildable space applied to the total tract, without <br /> 15 consideration of unbuildable areas or rights-of-way. They also indicated that <br /> 16 no more than two units per acre would be applied to the remaining 70%. The <br /> 17 work Group held an organizational meeting and then participated in a design <br /> is workshop. A set of recommendations was presented to the governing boards. <br /> 19 The basic issues before the Work Group were how much open space to recommend, <br /> 20 exactly what is open space, how much density should be allowed and how would <br /> 21 it be applied. Also, issues surrounding water and sewer services were <br /> 22 discussed. In February two teams were foamed. The Hillsborouqh team was <br /> 23 comprised of the Town Board members and the developer's representatives. The <br /> 24 County team consisted of the County Commissioners and the neighborhood's <br /> 25 representatives. Both teams presented a plan. The neighborhood also <br /> 26 presented the "Arendt Plan". Each of these proposed plans resulted in a <br /> 27 recommended primary conservation area of 151.9 acres; however, the secondary <br /> 28 conservation areas varied greatly. Hillsborough's plan suggested 248.8 acres, <br /> 29 orange County's plan suggested 309.7 acres and the Arendt plan suggested 523.4 <br /> 30 acres. Charts showing how theme figures were reached are in the r*rmanent <br /> 31 agenda file in the Clerk's office. A chart titled, "summary of open space and <br /> 32 development characteristics for the University Station site" indicated the <br /> 33 number of allowable units for each of these plans. The Hillsborouqh plan <br /> 34 allowed 1,0&2 units, the orange County plan allowed 930 and the Arendt plan <br /> 35 allowed 464. The fork Group reached consensus on the issue of public <br /> 36 utilities provided that they be limited to the University Station project and <br /> 37 that the limitation be enforceable. The density would be limited to 946 <br /> 38 individual units, however, the density impact would be addressed by the County <br /> 39 as a part of the public hearing process. Also, the level of density could be <br /> 40 adjusted subject to the monetary advantages of land conservancy to the <br /> 41 developers. Intensive, discussion focused on the use of the 160 acres between <br /> 42 old NC 10 and the railroad tract. Initially consensus was reached, however, <br /> 43 it was decided that further discussion was needed to define an option which <br /> 44 establishes for this area an appropriate mix of open space, elements of the <br /> 45 golf course, wildlife corridor, and/or necessary number of housing units. <br /> 46 various options are being presented for citizen comment at this meeting. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 A now Land Use Plan category titled "Open Space Development Area, is <br /> 49 also being presented at this Public Hearing. The Board of Commissioners are <br /> 50 scheduled to receive a report on May 17th on the Rural Character Strategies. <br /> 51 on May 23rd, at the regular. Quarterly Public Hearing, another public hearing <br /> 52 will be held relating to this issue. Zoning Standards and a new Zoning <br />