Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-I
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 05-02-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-I
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 9:43:05 AM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:58:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-I
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940502
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r` <br /> LETTERS TO <br /> FCRUM That Rolland, <br /> PAGE 4 Nobody says it like Rolland Wrenn. <br /> THE CHAPEL HILL HERALD THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 1994 She could be a comedian, with her <br /> ability and wit to make people laugh, <br /> EDITORIAL _ or maybe she could be a politician (an <br /> honest one). She has a true knowledge <br /> of what government is all about, <br /> more importantly,just what it should <br /> Put <br /> water first be about! <br /> I know — she could be a "stand-up <br /> politician!" We all know most politi- <br /> Orange County should hold tight on new watershed regulations. A proposal for off-site cians are just a big joke anyway. But, <br /> septic easements would only allow more development — and potential pollution — near drinking- whatever. <br /> water supplies. <br /> When it comes to protecting drinking water, the The only problem is that county officials now think <br /> Health-care plan requin <br /> public can either pay now or later. The Carrboro they rushed through the changes, which including We're with Harry and Louise on <br /> aldermen's recommendation this week that the county zoning Orange County's last two unzoned townships, Hillary's Health Security Act. Some- <br /> commissioners resist tinkering ith the county's new body has to explain her awesomely <br /> g Y' Little River and Cedar Grove. <br /> watershed regulations is right on the money. complicated plan, with wildly In addition to the amendment allowing off-site septic unreal- <br /> istic costs to freedom and purse. <br /> At issue is an amendment to allow off-site septic P easements, the county also wants to reduce setbacks, After reading Elizabeth Mc- � <br /> easements in all Orange County watersheds except permitting septic systems and structures closer to water Caughey's searing article in the New <br /> University Lake. In the short term, that means property supplies than now allowed. Republic (2/7/99) the only conclusion <br /> owners whose land did not perk would be allo%ved to <br /> While we support emergency-case easements for to be drawn is: Only a couple of flow- <br /> buy the rights to drain their sewage onto a neighbor's property owners with failing systems— and indeed even er children from the '60s, with Yale ` <br /> property. In the long run, it means more houses being law degrees, and plenty of hubris, <br /> built near water supplies than might otherwise be supported the extension of water and sewer into the <br /> PP 1; would have the arrogance to want to <br /> possible. rural buffer to help the Piney Mountain neighborhood — force us to make huge sacrifices and <br /> Opponents concede no one's talking about subdivisions allowing such easements throughout the watersheds give government absolute control t <br /> in the watersheds. But the proposed amendments remain seems unnecessary. t <br /> over our lives. <br /> troubling because they seem to backtrack on protecting County staff argue that there would be relatively few It's government bureaucrats — not s <br /> the community's most important resource. such easements and that the proposed amendments the consumer, who will decide who r <br /> The surest method of maintaining water quality, would provide the flexibility needed to encourage cluster gets care, when and by which doctor. s <br /> unfortunately, is also the most expensive. A government developments. The latter is a worthwhile goal and one Clinton/Gore claim "government is <br /> this paper has supported in connection with open space. broken" and say they intend to "rein- 1 <br /> simply buys the reservoir and all the land that drains vent it."They believe we won't notice <br /> into it, thus preventing the kind of development whose But even the most progressive development schemes that we are being old to sacrifice our a <br /> runoff— from cars, lawns and other uses— threatens must take a back seat to protecting the quality of a g f <br /> P g q y freedoms, as health care is turned 2 <br /> water quality. community's drinking water. In addition to the over to our broken government. t; <br /> Short of that, governments protect water supplies aldermen, the Orange Water and Sewer Authority also Congress sensibly exempted them c <br /> through zoning. The watershed ordinance that the opposes the amendments. selves and federal workers from Hill- H <br /> county commissioners adopted last year does that by The commissioners took an important stand for ary's monstrosity! Ask Rep. Price if he I, <br /> limiting development near water supplies and the protecting drinking-water quality when they adopted the thinks individuals should be pros- s, <br /> streams that feed into them. new regulations. They should leave them alone. ecuted for the crime of seeking better h <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.