Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-E
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 05-02-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 9:40:42 AM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-E
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940502
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Y <br /> I That residential uses be eliminated from the list of permitted uses <br /> allowed in Secondary Development Areas in the 1.40 101d N.C. 86 <br /> Economic Development District. <br /> That Section 14, subsection entitled'Water Supply&Sewage Dispose, <br /> be revised to include a statement encou`_agknr the installation of'dry' <br /> C <br /> 74 sewer lines, at the time of site development, where septic systems are <br /> used&or* with utility providers to establish incentives for installation <br /> of such lines, including a waiver of tap-on fees �� r <br /> That Section 11, subsection entitled 'Schematic Plans', be revised to <br /> include a statement that property owners and/or developers,particularly <br /> those with large tracts of laud, are encouraged to prepare plans which <br /> .oOIS �.t!rs reflect market forces while providing a coordinated'theme'or'blend"of <br /> Aeceot-r compatible uses. In addition, encourage. the Economic Development <br /> ?Commission to continue its efforts to involve/communicate with all <br /> landowners in accomplishing the same goal. <br /> 6. That the Economic Development Districts be monitored for at least 2.3 <br /> years as suggested by the Commissioners to identify the following <br /> impacts: <br /> a. What will be the fiscal impact; <br /> e s ' fi pact; i.a, on the County's <br /> omuting budget and tax base,of non-residendal developme t in <br /> the,Zw c Development Dis,tri5ts? G�MSII�ei^ <br /> / ,r c,�-rte 6 2 <br /> b. What additional residential growth will t:enerated as a result <br /> of the Ewnamic Development Districts? <br /> (1) How many of the employees working at businesses in the <br /> Economic Development Districts live in Orange County? <br /> (2) How many of the jobs will be filled by new us. existing <br /> residents? <br /> (3) What will be the fiscal impact of new residential growth <br /> attributable to the Economic DaWapment Districts? <br /> G What wages will be paid/are being paid by businesses which <br /> locate in the Economic Development Districts? <br /> The Planning Board recognized that confidentiality and/or legal <br /> limitations may limit the availability of some data. <br /> P That all references to'special use'approval be clarified to mean approval <br /> of a special use permit through the planned development process. <br /> Gt/ j The vote of the Planning Board wa3 urmnimow (11-0). Copies of the draft <br /> Planning Board minutes are attached which detail the discussion of the <br /> Planning Board on all issues referred to them by the Board of <br /> Commissioners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.