Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-E
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 05-02-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 9:40:42 AM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-E
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940502
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM 48 <br /> To: Board of Commissioners and Manager <br /> From: Alice Gordon AAF <br /> Subject: Points to Ponder - Economic Development Districts (EDDs) <br /> Date: February 11, 1994 <br /> Included below is a list of points to ponder while you are considering the <br /> proposal for the Economic Development Districts. <br /> 1. Lend Use Plan <br /> According to the December 6 BOCC agenda packet, "the Board of <br /> Commissioners asked that specific parcels be identified for pre-zoning for <br /> economic development purposes in a manner consistent with the <br /> Orange County Land Use Plan.' <br /> A. Existing Nodes. In the current Orange County Land Use Plan, <br /> commercial - industrial nodes exist in the 185/Buckhorn Road area and in <br /> the 185/US70 area. Thera is no existing nods In the 140/01056 area (and <br /> only a small percentage of transition area), so the ED node in this area is <br /> not consistent with our current Land Use Plan. <br /> 8. Criteria for Location of Activity Nodes. The "locational criteria' <br /> for "commercial- industrial transition activity nodes" and for "commercial <br /> transition activity nodes" differ from the locational criteria for "economic <br /> development activity nodes (transition areas)" in systematic ways. For <br /> exampl e, here i s a compact son usi ng three of the crf teri a, name]y, 1 and <br /> slope, public services/utilities, and population density. <br /> Land Slope <br /> Com Ind - 'Located on land with slopes of less than 15N grade <br /> Ec Dsv - "Located on land with slopes of less than i 5N grade. Where <br /> 1109as of 152 or greater we Meant, gn can be provided de throuch <br /> arguer site design and construction oraeticas " <br /> Public Sdnhces/Utilities <br /> Com Ind - 'Located in areas V1�. Hch are or could be reasonably and <br /> effectively served by cen&a)1z9d public services and utilities." <br /> Ec Dev - "Located ggn rly in areas which are or could be reasonably and <br /> effectively served by public services and facilities. When located in areas <br /> where such services and facilities are not present or DIannad. general soil <br /> condi ti ns m.u-st be sui tabl e for on-site sew 9e disposal sy is ems." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.