Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-E
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 05-02-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-02-1994-IX-E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 9:40:42 AM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-E
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940502
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42 <br /> oppficabfe perfwrnwwe standards and deign criteria contained in Article 629 of the Zoning Ordinance - <br /> DaxIqw=W Standards fir Economic Development(ED)Districts.All such proposals shall include the entire <br /> parcel or lot of record as of , 1994, the 47betive state of this amendment: <br /> The simplicity of this option is that it utilizes an existing procedure.Since many parcels in the Economic Development <br /> zoning districts are large, a developer would be subject to subdivision approval. While site plans for each site would <br /> not be required,the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners could address broader issues such as access points, <br /> traffic impacts and circulation, utility service, etc.By requiring that the entire panel be included in the subdivision, <br /> piecemeal development of larger tracts would be avoided. Conditions could be included in the Resolution of Approval, <br /> providing the parameters for staff to use in approving individual site plans and for the developer in terms of <br /> determining when plan amendments were necessary. <br /> OPTION#3-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT(RECOJEWENDED BY ORDINANCE REVIEW COACW TER) <br /> This option is nothing more than the existing language adopted on March 2 by the Board of Commissioners. Optional <br /> wording has been provided(in bakybee italics)in the event that the Board of Commissioners wishes to amend Article <br /> 7. <br /> 1. Amend Article 7 by revising Article 7.2.1 to include (eliminate)the PD-ED Planned Development-Economic <br /> Development District as a permitted Planned Development District as follows: <br /> 7.2.1 Establishment of the Planned Development Districts <br /> Planned Development districts that correspond to the following districts authorized in Article <br /> 4 are hereby created: <br /> R-13 - PD-H - R-13 <br /> R-8 - PD-H - R-8 <br /> R-5 - PD-H - R-5 <br /> R-4 - PD-H - R-4 <br /> R-2 - PD-H-R-2 <br /> R-1 - PD-H - R-1 <br /> RB - PD-H - RB <br /> LC-1 - PD-C - LC-1 <br /> NC-2 - PD-C-NC-2 <br /> CC-3 - PD-C - CC-3 <br /> GC-4 - PD-C - GC-4 <br /> 0I.1 - PD - OI-1 <br /> I-1 - PD - I-1 <br /> I.2 - PD - I-2 <br /> I-3 - PD - I.3 <br /> ED - PD - ED <br /> PW-I - PD - PW-I <br /> PD - MU <br /> PD - R <br /> PD - MHP <br /> 2. Amend Article 7 by adding(eliminating)Article 7.21 -PD-ED Planned Development-Economic Development <br /> District which reads as follows: <br /> 7.21 PD-ED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT <br /> The following regulations and requirements apply to PD-ED Planned Development-Economic <br /> Development Districts. <br /> 7.21.1 PD-ED District: Definition and Intent <br /> PD-ED districts may be established in accordance with the general procedures and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.