Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2008-3d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008-3d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:25:09 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Orange County, North Carolina - AIFCH - 2007 <br />• Christian cross <br />• Jewish star <br />• Male or Female symbol <br />• National flag <br />F. Examples of Directions <br />• Existing black developments <br />• Existing development known whites <br />• Neighborhood known for racial make-up <br />• Neighborhood known for national origin of inhabitants <br />• Synagogue <br />• Church <br />• Congregation <br />• Parish <br />G. Examples of Area or Location Description <br />• Country clubs <br />• Private school designations <br />• Names of facilities used by exclusively one sex. <br />While the lists of questionable words, phrases and symbols noted above may seem extensive, a <br />publisher who is sensitive to the requirements of the law will quickly develop a sense of the type <br />of advertisements which may raise a question under the law. <br />The basic test for any advertiser should be: would the ordinary reader construe the advertising <br />as sending a message of preference for or against a particular class of home seeker? <br />8.2 Analysis of Advertising <br />A. Methodology <br />To ascertain whether advertising in the Orange County area deviates from the statutory and <br />regulatory language of the FHAA, a representative sampling of 400 ads from the primary local <br />newspaper, other newspapers in the County, and three Internet-based services was surveyed to <br />determine whether discriminatory practices were evident. <br />The Consultants examined advertisements for: <br />1) Explicitly discriminatory statements <br />2) Language that could serve as a subtle discouragement <br />3) Use of human models <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.