Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2008-3d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008-3d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:25:09 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County, North Carolina - AIFCH - 2007 <br />were denied 11 % of the time. Low-to-moderate income Whites and Blacks fared better in terms <br />of applications and origination's than middle-income borrowers. <br />Even when lenders reported high Black origination rates, it appears Blacks are still not getting in <br />the door to make an application. Origination rates for Blacks were lower than Whites, and denial <br />rates for Blacks were higher than Whites. At each income level, the denial rate was usually <br />higher for Blacks than for Whites. <br />It's clear that, Whites fare much better in the MSA's mortgage lending market. While Hispanics <br />are a smaller population group, in many cases they seem to do better than Blacks, too, when <br />percentages of applications, origination's and denials are compared. Even when comparing <br />income-to-income, Blacks fall short of their White counter parts. <br />This is not necessarily an indication that lending discrimination is the cause of this discrepancy. <br />However, a deeper analysis of lending should be undertaken to compare multiple years, prime <br />and sub-prime lending and other questions that could not be addressed in this analysis. <br />7.0 Community Issues <br />7.1 Community Survey <br />The Consultants conducted a survey of Orange County community organizations, agencies, and <br />individuals focusing on housing issues selected by the Orange County Human Relations <br />Commission. The survey offered several open-ended questions designed to document how <br />those living within the community viewed their own housing barriers. Agency directors or <br />managers were encouraged to answer questions in any way they felt necessary. In addition, the <br />questionnaire was distributed to City Council members and two suggested community interest <br />groups. In all, 21 entities were invited to respond. Some of the responses spoke of positive <br />actions that were taking place and these were included. For instance, for Question 3 one <br />respondent noted: Programs designed by city, county and municipalities to transition individuals <br />from homelessness to stability through jobs and housing. The following is a summary of issues <br />raised in their responses and observations.2 <br />QUESTION #1: What do you see as problems for individuals with disabilities in achieving <br />housing that meets their needs in Orange County? <br />The primary concern for those responding was the cost of housing, lack of adequate housing, <br />and the need for accessible housing for the disabled. Many indicated a need for stronger <br />advocacy for this population. <br />® Lack of access, availability and affordability <br />2 Actual responses are included as an Appendix. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.