Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2008-3d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008-3d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:25:09 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:59:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Orange County, North Carolina - AIFCH - 2007 <br />income (80% or less of median household income}. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, Orange <br />County's Median Household Income was $29,046. Low-to-moderate income was at $23,236 or <br />less. <br />The HMDA database for lenders provides an income breakdown of mortgage loan applicants at <br />the application, origination, denial stages, allowing the Consultant to assess which lenders have <br />been most successful in servicing the mortgage credit needs of low-to-moderate income <br />households. <br />All lenders combined for 26.7% of the low-to-moderate income market share in the MSA. <br />As with applications by race, local lenders were poorly represented. Capital Bank had 36.1 <br />(22) of low-to-moderate income applications, the largest percentage of any local lender. RBC <br />Centura was second with '22.8% (21). BB&T was the smallest lender in terms of low-to- <br />moderate income applications with 5% on just four applications. <br />Comparing lenders in terms of originations from low-to-moderate income applicants and upper- <br />income applicants, shows a 56.8% average for low-to-moderate income applicants in the MSA, <br />and 82% for upper-income applicants. This is expected since upper-income applicants would <br />typically be more qualified. ° <br />Almost 57% of applications from low-to-moderate income residents were originated, showing <br />that one out of every two applications is successful. <br />Seven of the nine local lenders had origination rates for low-to-moderate income applicants over <br />60%. Local lenders seem to be reaching out to low-to-moderate income applicants. However, <br />the fact that five of the local lenders had single-digit applications from this income group is a <br />concern. <br />6.12 Lending Based on Race and Income <br />This section reviews activity by all lenders and gives some indication of how Blacks and Whites <br />fare in obtaining conventional home loans when income levels are considered. In many cases, <br />the rate of applications to Whites is four to five times greater than to Blacks. <br />Typically, upper-income applicants would have the least trouble in obtaining a loan. In all <br />income groups, White rates fared better in applications, origination and denials. However, <br />upper-income Blacks had a 65% chance of being approved, while Whites of equal income had <br />an 85% chance of being approved. <br />This disparity is more alarming among those earning between 80% and 119% of median <br />income-the middle class. In the Orange County MSA, Blacks in this income range had a 51% <br />origination rate, while Whites had a 75% rate. Blacks were denied 20% of the time and Whites <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.