Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-14-1994 - C-1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 04-14-94 Joint Planning Public Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-14-1994 - C-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 9:25:30 AM
Creation date
2/19/2015 8:59:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/14/1994
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940414
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
relocation of SR 1104 . Beyond that it indicates that the OWASA <br /> quarry reservoir and existing quarry pit will provide flood control <br /> benefits by containing excess stormwater which would be released <br /> later at controlled rates. <br /> In applying the locational criteria for Extractive Use and Rural <br /> Industrial Activity Node, HYDROLOGY was the only criterion to <br /> receive a "QUESTIONABLE" evaluation. This alone is not <br /> justification for a negative recommendation. However, from the <br /> standpoint of the requested amendment, HYDROLOGY is arguably the <br /> single most important locational criterion. It is precisely for <br /> reasons such as this that there are other policy considerations <br /> that come into play in acting on such amendments under the JPA and <br /> Land Use Element. These considerations take into account the public <br /> interest; the health, safety and general welfare of Orange County <br /> citizens. In evaluating these amendments against the criteria, the <br /> "benefits" of guaranteed future water storage capacity - including <br /> safeguards contained in the four-party agreement - seem to outweigh <br /> the reservations associated with expanding the use within the <br /> watershed. <br /> The following water quality and visual mitigation measures <br /> identified in the EIS offer additional safeguards. <br /> Water Ouality <br /> - Minimizing soil exposure by the staging of grading and <br /> revegetation. <br /> - Interception and/or diversion of runoff. <br /> - Application of surface covers. <br /> - Installation of silt fences, erosion screens, and bale <br /> barriers. <br /> - Provision of grass shoulders, grass-lined ditches and <br /> vegetation buffers. <br /> - Maintain a 50 foot buffer between mining operations and <br /> Phil's Creek as required by the existing special use permit. <br /> Visual <br /> - Minimizing roadway cut and fill slopes. <br /> - Roadway alignment following the existing groundline wherever <br /> possible. <br /> - Landscape planting and natural revegetation to the cut and <br /> fill slopes. <br /> - Maintain landscape planting and natural vegetation in the <br /> quarry buffer zones. <br /> - Maintain the 300 foot buffer between extraction areas and <br /> residences and public lands as required by the existing <br /> special use permit. <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.