S Grant Acceptance Letter from the State Historic Preservation Office

Browse Search

10 Since the inception of its comprehensive p program, a goal of Orange County has been the ' completion of detailed inventories of its cultural, historical, recreational, biological, and geological resources. In 1986, the P ]Department completed a general listing of such sites in the unincorporated portions i of the county. In 1983, a Master Recreation and Parks Plan was prepared for Orange County. During the same year, the Triangle Lend Conservancy completed an Inventory of Natural Areas and wildlife Habitats of Orange Count. These studies provided the detailed inventory of recreational, geological, and biological sites. Consistent with the above goal, Orange County applied for Survey and P Grant Funds to undertake inventories of historic and archaeological sites in the unincorporated portions of the county. These inventories as well as the preparation of a publication manuscript were undertaken in the foll owing phases: Grant Year Phase Pray 1991 I Inventory of unincorporated portions of Chapel Hill Township i (159 structures identified) 1992 II Inventory of unincorporated portions of remau�ng six townships (50 7 structures identified) 1993 III Archaeological survey and preparation of publication manuscript N (Project currently underway) x The results of the archaeological survey as well as the architectural survey were to be used in completing Phase IV of Orange County's program. That phase consisted of the preparation of a reservation plan; e. ., the Historic Preservation Element of the Comprehensive P P g Plan, and nominations P for the National Register of Historic Places. Rather than a four-phase project, Orange County proposes to expand the project to five phases. Phase IV will involve the preparation of the Historic Preservation Element, while Phase V will consist of the preparation of the National Register nominations. The rationale for this shift in priorities is based on Orange County's long-term use of its Comprehensive Plan to guide land use decisions. while the Historic Preservation Element is but one part of that Plan, it will provide a framework within which the Board of Commissioners, the Historic Preservation Commission, and the P Board can work to preserve the county's rural character and heritage. In that sense, the process and product produced from the project could serve as a prototype for other rural counties threatened with the loss of historic, architectural, and archaeological resources from growth and development. It is an overall program approach to preservation rather than piecemeal initiatives which may gain some iocumediate benefits but provide limited long-term results.