Orange County NC Website
109 <br />• Modifications to both the ingress and egress routes from the park- and -ride lot and BRT <br />program. <br />Orange County Transportation Staff Comments <br />The North -South corridor should be shared by multiple transit agencies, including Orange Public <br />Transit (420 Route), Triangle Transit, and Chapel Hill Transit (Interlining). The location of a <br />northern terminus park and ride lot for connection to any future BRT in the MLK corridor should <br />be considered during the review of the EDGE development. Keeping the proximity of the <br />existing park and ride lot (downsized or structural) would facilitate 2 strong retail opportunities: <br />one, allow commuters to shop nearby before return to exurbia and two, allow students from <br />campus and MLK areas to shop and use retail and restaurants creating transit demand nodes at <br />both north and south ends promoting efficiency. <br />Stormwater <br />The project is located in the Jordan Lake Unprotected Watershed and the Town of Chapel Hill <br />enforces its stormwater regulations within its municipal limits. However, County staff may <br />suggest increasing mitigation of stormwater impacts. While the development will be required to <br />preserve stream buffers and install best - management type post - development stormwater <br />management facilities, primarily for peak flow attenuation and nutrient export reduction, the <br />County would be interested inassisting in one or more of the following: <br />1. Upgrading the proposed stormwater management facilities to a higher level of nutrient <br />reduction, such as including bio- retention or stormwater wetlands, with the goal of <br />reaching or beating export limits recognized by Orange County (2.2 pounds per acre <br />nitrogen & 0.82 pounds per acre phosphorus), without compensatory mitigation. <br />2. Evaluating a portion of the adjacent property for an off -site regional stormwater <br />management facility that would have a net neutral or positive impact on water quality, <br />when contrasted with existing conditions. <br />The benefits which the applicant may realize include reduction in compensatory mitigation or, in <br />the case of option 2, some potential for increased on -site development. In the case of the latter, <br />Orange County would encourage Chapel Hill to ensure that this "additional capacity" would not <br />be utilized to press the nutrient limits but rather to actually improve the outcome. <br />Affordable Housing <br />The applicant is voluntarily proposing to allocate land for 50 affordable on -site multi - family rental <br />units and agrees to pursue funding to bring the units to fruition. This would be equivalent to 7% <br />- 13% (depending on the final mix) of the new housing created within the project. Financing <br />approval for up to 50 affordable units would be pursued for a period of no less than 5 -years after <br />SUP approval, and land allocated for the new affordable units would be held for this use during <br />the period. If financing were awarded, the proposed development would target renters earning <br />less 80% of less of the area median income and would remain affordable for 15 — 30 years, <br />depending on the requirements of the funding agency. If Low Income Housing Tax Credits or <br />bond financing is awarded, the project could serve households earning less than 60% of the <br />area median income. <br />1 -40 Road Buffer <br />Chapel Hill had inquired about Orange County's Major Transportation Corridor buffer. The <br />applicant had requested clearing near 1 -40 for additional visibility. While Orange County allows <br />50% clearing in certain circumstances in the various types of buffers we enforce, we do not <br />allow clearing in the stream buffers. <br />