Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-2015 - E1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 02-19-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-19-2015 - E1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 8:37:50 AM
Creation date
2/18/2015 11:15:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
E1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
270 <br />271 <br />272 <br />273 <br />274 <br />275 <br />276 <br />277 <br />278 <br />279 <br />280 <br />281 <br />282 <br />283 <br />284 <br />285 <br />286 <br />287 <br />288 <br />289 <br />290 <br />291 <br />292 <br />293 <br />294 <br />295 <br />296 <br />297 <br />298 <br />299 <br />300 <br />301 <br />302 <br />303 <br />304 <br />305 <br />Approved 2/4/15 <br />Paul Guthrie: It seems to me that if this process will work at all, this Board may have a bigger responsibility because <br />we have one shot to raise the critical questions that need to be considered in the decisions and that doesn't happen <br />in the joint session now where we sit there and listen to something until 11 o'clock at night and then by the time it's <br />over we can't even remember what the questions are that you really think need to be considered. I think we have an <br />obligation if this becomes practice to think through how we communicate through staff to the Board of County <br />Commissioners on issues that need to be dealt with by the Commissioners at the time of testimony. The Boards that <br />I have seen operate in this County only occasionally rise to that level. The staff rises to it but I'm not sure the boards <br />do and we need to think about that as a Board. <br />Perdita Holtz: Probably what will happen is that the Planning Board minutes will become part of that public hearing <br />packet. <br />Craig Benedict: We would accent anything different that occurred in the application from the original material. We do <br />accent any new information, any change in information that has occurred from the original application and evidentiary <br />material that comes forward. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Ok, so the action for tonight is? <br />Perdita Holtz: Is there consensus that this flowchart captured the quasi-judicial discussion. <br />MOTION by Paul Guthrie that the flowchart captured the Planning Board discussion of the quasi-judicial process. <br />Seconded by Buddy Hartley. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Lydia Wegman: Let me clarify. I am voting to say the flowchart captures what we've talked about, I am not saying I <br />agree with it just to be clear. <br />AGENDA IT COMMITTEE /ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS: <br />Board of Adjustment <br />AGENDA ITEM 10: ADJOURNM <br />MOTION by Bryan ren to adjourn. Seconded by Tony Blake. <br />VOTE: UNANWOUS <br />Pete Hallenbeck, Chair <br />M. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.