Orange County NC Website
1A <br />Approved 11/5/14 <br />753 meeting where the Planning Board has a quorum versus requiring Planning Board members to attend and if you <br />754 have bad attendance then the Commissioners can do something about it, like say thank you for your service but <br />755 you're not cutting it. We're going to be there and we're going to hear the public hearing input. The commissioners <br />756 certainly have the ability while we're there, even if it's not a joint meeting, to ask if there are any comments from the <br />757 Planning Board. It's well within their purview so I just don't see that dropping the official joint with a quorum <br />758 requirement, I don't think that will change the process a whole lot. What it will do is not hold up a meeting where you <br />759 have 100 citizens there. <br />760 <br />761 Craig Benedict: From what I'm hearing from the discussion, there seems to be somewhat of a role of the Board in a <br />762 differentiation between how they act on a legislative matter, where they can hear opinions left and right, they can <br />763 hear the community and they can see the site versus the quasi-judicial nature where your role is more structured. <br />764 Not that we are making any determinations tonight, but maybe when we do this interim report, maybe there are two <br />765 different processes that we follow for legislative matters versus a quasi-judicial and right now they're clustered <br />766 together and maybe we should take a look at the role of the Board on a legislative matter and how we get input <br />767 versus a quasi-judicial matter follow a different tract. Does that sound reasonable? <br />768 <br />769 Pete Hallenbeck: In general, what I'm hearing, and I realize there is variation everywhere, is everybody agrees there <br />770 is great value in having the Planning Board at the quarterly public hearing. The challenge is if you don't have a <br />771 quorum, we don't want that to derail anything. I am also hearing people are happy with this concept that the Planning <br />772 Board can take citizen input so we can get that sooner and hopefully that combined with the 45 days will just make <br />773 everything go better. Most of what we've been talking about is for the legislative processes which are 88% of the <br />774 time. The quasi - judicial is a different process and we need to work on knowing what our role is in that. That may be <br />775 something staff and the attorney can work on to educate us on that a little bit better but again 88% of the time it is <br />776 legislative and it would be great to also notify all Planning Board member of any neighborhood information meeting <br />777 that is going on so we have a chance to get out there and see what is going on. Those are the main points I'm <br />778 pulling out. Is there anything major anyone can think of? <br />779 <br />780 Laura Nicholson: So, is the idea that we will have quorum and we'll all just internally say we are going to be better <br />781 about getting quorum or was there some barrier that maybe some of us that are new don't understand why we <br />782 couldn't get a quorum before? <br />783 <br />784 Pete Hallenbeck: My personal opinion is to drop the quorum requirement because we've blown it two or three times <br />785 and if we blow it one more time, it is just, it's getting to the point it's not excusable and that's also based on the fact <br />786 that if we can just impress upon people how important it is to be there, it's not clear what the quorum is doing and the <br />787 Commissioners can still ask Planning Board members who are present for comments and input. <br />788 <br />789 Laura Nicholson: It's just funny that you're saying we need to make sure that we all know that it's really important to <br />790 be there but it's not a requirement. If it's really important to be there it should be a requirement. <br />791 <br />792 Pete Hallenbeck: It should but then when you don't have it, we were lucky that we had only a 30 minute delay. What <br />793 would happen if you had a meeting and you didn't have quorum and you tell all these people I'm sorry we just don't <br />794 have the people, we'll try this again in three months. <br />795 <br />796 Laura Nicholson: I agree I just don't see how we can't have a quorum. <br />797 <br />798 Lisa Stuckey: Why don't we ask staff, what's the problem? Do we know why people haven't shown up? What's <br />799 been the issue? <br />800 <br />801 Perdita Holtz: I think it just depends on the personalities that you have on the Board. How seriously people take their <br />802 position. <br />803 <br />804 Tina Love: There has never been a time when staff went to the meeting without a quorum. I have never left work at <br />805 the end of the day that staff didn't have a quorum. If I haven't heard from you, I get on the phone and I call you and 1 <br />806 keep on calling until I reach you, and I'm sorry about that, but we have to ensure there is a quorum. Then staff gets <br />15 <br />