Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-19-2015 - E1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 02-19-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-19-2015 - E1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 8:37:50 AM
Creation date
2/18/2015 11:15:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
E1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M.- <br />advertisement. She said this may be why the Board of County Commissioners reviews the ad, <br />and she likes the way this process is done now. <br />Commissioner Gordon said she wanted to make sure that all property is being posted, <br />and people are being notified by certified mail. <br />Perdita Holtz said this is not going away. She said the requirement for certified mail is <br />only for developer initiated applications. <br />Commissioner Gordon said there used to be more development applications. The <br />economy may be the reason there are currently not as many development applications and <br />therefore relatively fewer quasi- judicial public hearings. <br />Commissioner Gordon said her suggestion about waiting to vote is in reference to the <br />first time a major public hearing is held. She said it is okay to decide something tonight for this <br />item. <br />She said the Board needs to be careful about having too many categories of hearings, <br />each with a different process, because it might be confusing to the public. <br />Commissioner Price said the flow chart states that the public can come to the Planning <br />Board prior to the public hearing. She asked if these comments will then be entered into the <br />record of the public hearing. <br />Perdita Holtz said the record only relates to the quasi - judicial process, but not the <br />legislative process. She said the flow chart in the packet is related to the legislative process. <br />Commissioner Price asked if this flow chart would be the same for both. <br />Perdita Holtz said there would be a slightly different flowchart for quasi - judicial, but it <br />would follow the same general cadence. <br />Commissioner Price asked if the public would be invited to speak at the Planning Board <br />meeting. <br />Perdita Holtz said the public would not be invited to speak, but there would possibly be <br />an opportunity for comment. She said all of this has not been worked out. <br />Commissioner Price said she is just concerned with the Board having an opportunity to <br />see these comments. <br />Perdita Holtz said there is not really a record of comments at public hearings for <br />legislative items. She said the comments show up in the minutes, just as comments show up <br />in the Planning Board minutes. <br />Commissioner Price referred to item 1 in the bottom blue section of the flowchart on <br />page 18. She asked when the public would be making comments if the item is not to be listed <br />in the meeting agenda. <br />Perdita Holtz said it would be listed as a regular item or a consent agenda item, but it <br />would not be listed under the public hearing section. <br />Commissioner Price said if it is on the consent agenda, the Commissioners may not <br />know that there is someone in the audience who wants to speak. <br />Perdita Holtz said the public can sign up, or the Chair can ask if anyone wishes to <br />speak before the consent agenda. <br />Chair Jacobs said he has never seen a planning item on the consent agenda. <br />Commissioner Pelissier said the recommendation is to stick with the quarterly public <br />hearings. She said this proposal solves the public input issue but not the timing issue. She <br />sees that the roadblock is that you have to provide information 10 days before a quarterly <br />public hearing, whereas you only have 4 days if a public hearing is added to a regular meeting. <br />She questioned whether it might be possible, for legislative public hearings, to provide <br />information on the website 10 days before, and then incorporate it in the agenda 4 days <br />before. <br />Perdita Holtz said there is no actual requirement to have it available 10 days in <br />advance, but that is the practice that Orange County has had for 20 years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.