Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2008 - 1early
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008
>
Agenda - 04-15-2008 - 1early
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2008 12:51:10 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:58:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
Minutes - 20080415 - Transfer Station
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
areas identified as having a high potential for archaeological remains. <br />(see footnote G) <br />H. Sites with County owned lands designated for park preservation -Figure 8, "Figure 7 with <br />exclusion of County owned park preservation areas" (see footnote H) <br />'County owned lands designated for preservation' (formally park preserve) -Those lands that have <br />been purchased by the county and have an approved master 'concept' plan designating certain areas <br />as a preserve or natural area not to be developed beyond low impact uses. <br />I. Sites within Protected Watershed Overlay District excepting therein those non-residential land use <br />activity nodes (i.e. commercial/industrial, commercial, industrial and economic development) <br />[LUE 1981-1994] -Figure 9, "Figure 8 with exclusion of all residential Protected Watershed <br />overlay districts" (see footnote I) <br />J. Sites with less than 25 acres in size unless transportation access, existing buffers and preliminary <br />transfer station layout demonstrates the adequacy of a smaller site -Figure 10 <br />• Single parcel or combination of parcels (see footnote .>) <br />ITEMS PENDING FURTHER DISCUSSION AND DECISION BY BOCC <br />^ Railway Access <br />Olver, Inc. Recommendation: <br />Move to "Technical Siting Criteria" to be considered under "Access to Major Transportation <br />Routes" <br />^ Wei~htin~ of Freely Offered Sites <br />Olver, Inc. Recommendation: <br />Add as additional element to be considered under "Community-Specific Siting Criteria" <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.