Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-08-2008-4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-08-2008
>
Agenda - 04-08-2008-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:12:46 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:57:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/8/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080408
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 3 8 <br />An initial appraisal of the reimbursement based on a five-year payback yielded the <br />following shares: <br />Orange County - $214,224; <br />Chapel Hill - $90,549; and <br />Carrboro - $29,524. <br />The Orange County share of $214, 224 was based on the Orange County deeded portion <br />of the Greene Tract - 60 acres - in addition to the Orange County interest in the <br />remainder. It is important to mention here, and will be amplified later, that the <br />reimbursement amounts will need to be recalculated as nothing in the Inter Local <br />Agreement or Amendment contemplates or provides for the 60 acres dedicated to landfill <br />system purposes to be used for other than system purposes. <br />Recent Developments <br />At the February meeting County staff was also asked to draft a set of guiding principles <br />and parameters for enacting the conservation easements. Conceptually these guiding <br />principles and parameters could apply equally to the 85.9 jointly held acres and the 60 <br />acres held solely the County. In working through this issue in anticipation of discussion <br />at or before the Assembly of Governments meeting, County staff was advised and has <br />received an opinion from the County Attorney to the BOCC of the need for the County <br />and Towns to specifically address changing the designation of the 60 acre parcel since <br />there is nothing in the Agreement or the Amendment that provides for reimbursement to <br />the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund in the event the 60 acre parcel is not used for landfill <br />system purposes. <br />A copy of the memorandum from the County Attorne~Attached herein <br />Further Direction Requested <br />As outlined, a reimbursement scenario inclusive of the County held 60 acres has already <br />been circulated. However, another potential amendment to the Solid Waste Interlocal <br />Agreement would alter these funding shares. The County Attorney has advised that the <br />Inter Local Agreement may be amended as required to reflect any changes in policy <br />direction the three jurisdictions may wish to make. <br />Attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.