Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-15-1994-IX-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 03-15-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-15-1994-IX-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2015 4:10:58 PM
Creation date
2/9/2015 4:10:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/15/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-B
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940315
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 �9 <br /> 3. That residential uses be eliminated from the list of permitted uses <br /> allowed in Secondary Development Areas in the I-40 101d N.C. 86 <br /> Economic Development District. <br /> That Section 2.4, subsection entitled"Water Supply&Sewage Disposal", <br /> / be revised to include a statement encouraFine the installation of"dry" <br /> C, T6 sewer lines, at the time of site development, where septic systems are <br /> usedCYork with utility providers to establish incentives for installation <br /> of such lines, including a waiver of tap-on fees <br /> That Section 2.1, subsection entitled "Schematic Plans", be revised to <br /> include a statement that property owners and/or developers,particularly <br /> L those with large tracts of land, are encouraged to prepare plans which <br /> reflect market forces while providing a coordinated"theme"or"blend"of <br /> hec6155 compatible uses. In addition, encourage the Economic Development <br /> ?Commission to continue its efforts to involvelcommunicate with all <br /> landowners in accomplishing the same goal. <br /> 6. That the Economic Development Districts be monitored for at least 2-3 <br /> years as suggested by the Commissioners to identify the following <br /> impacts. <br /> �0 <br /> e S ' D a. What will be the fiscal impact; i.e., impact on the County's <br /> operating budget and tax base,of non-residential developmee t in <br /> the Economjc Development Distri ? U5 U eew5'1 re;" <br /> b. What additional residential growth will eggenerated as a result <br /> of the Economic Development Districts? <br /> (1) How many of the employees working at businesses in the <br /> Economic Development Districts live in Orange County? <br /> (2) How many of the jobs will be filled by new vs. existing <br /> residents? <br /> (3) What will be the fiscal impact of new residential growth <br /> attributable to the Economic Development Districts? <br /> C. What wages will be paid/are being paid by businesses which <br /> locate in the Economic Development Districts? <br /> The Planning Board recognized that confidentiality and/or legal <br /> limitations may limit the availability of some data. <br /> 7 That all references to"special use"approval be clarified to mean approval <br /> /' ,/��/? of a special use permit through the planned development process. <br /> W!7 j The vote of the Planning Board was unanimous (11-0). Copies of the draft <br /> Planning Board minutes are attached which detail the discussion of the <br /> Planning Board on all issues referred to them by the Board of <br /> Commissioners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.