Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-2008-c1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-01-2008
>
Agenda - 04-01-2008-c1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:35:24 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:56:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080401
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachement 4 13 <br />commercial operation commencing on the property. The applicant is also proposing to <br />develop buss stop facilities on the property to make the project assessable to mass transit. <br />In consultation with the County Engineer and the City of Mebane, water and sewer <br />services can be provided to support this project. The applicant will be required to make <br />modifications to existing service lines in order to accommodate the proposed <br />development as well as allow for additional development within the Interstate <br />85Buckhorn Road Economic Development District. This information is referenced <br />within the Utility Master Plan contained within the project narrative. <br />Staff is still awaiting comments from the North Carolina Department of Transportation, <br />and the City of Mebane, to determine if the proposed modifications to local roadways, or <br />infrastructure improvements, are adequate to support the project. <br />Staff is still waiting on comments from NC DOT and the City of Mebane. Staff <br />cannot make a finding on this item at this time. <br />(c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unified control and the suitability of any proposed <br />agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, contributions, guarantees, <br />or other instruments, or the need for such instruments, or for amendments in those <br />proposed; <br />In reviewing the application, the Zoning Officer can make the following finding: <br />i. That there is adequate evidence showing .unified control and sustainability <br />of agreements for the project. <br />(d) As to the suitability of plans proposed or the desir°ability of amendments; <br />Staff Comment: Please refer to the next section for a discussion on this item. <br />(e) As to the adherence to PD or general regulations or as to desirable specific <br />modifications in PD or general regulations as applied to the particular case, based on <br />determination that such modifications ar•e necessary or justified in the particular case by <br />demonstration that 'the public purposes of PD or other regulations would be met to at <br />least an equivalent degree by such modifications. <br />Staff Comme~zt: Please refer to the next section for a discussion on this item. <br />ASSESSMENT/ANALYSIS OF DESIGN SOLUTIONS: <br />As outlined within Section 7.21.1 of the Ordinance, the overall purpose and intent of PD/SUP <br />projects is to: `provide for properly located and planned non-residential development consistent <br />with Orange County's Strategic Plan for Economic Development'. This process is intended to <br />provide an opporiiuuty for development proposals to be considered for approval when such plans <br />do not: <br />1. Meet the criteria for site plan approval listed in Article 14.3; <br />2. Address agency comments solicited during the site plan review process; and/or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.