Orange County NC Website
�-7 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> 306F REVERE ROAD <br /> HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br /> c <br /> January 26, 1994 <br /> To: Citizens at the January 25, 1994 East-Central Orange <br /> Community Meeting (Rural Character Development Options) <br /> Dear Citizen: <br /> Let me again express my thanks to you for attending our community <br /> meeting on January 25. Your input and feedback is greatly valued, <br /> and I appreciate your candor and thoughtful responses. I am writing <br /> to clarify my response to a question during the meeting. Upon <br /> review, my response did not completely answer the question. <br /> The question related specifically to the "Staff Alternative,, <br /> development options, and the fact that density bonuses for open- <br /> space development options (Options Bl-B3) were based on "lot yield" <br /> under one-acre lot zoning. For example, you may remember the 100- <br /> acre tract in the handout table (bottom of page 4) - with three <br /> examples of a 100-acre tract with different site constraints. These <br /> tracts had 26, 50 and 101 septic tank "perc" sites, and would <br /> receive density bonuses of 20, 25 or 30% dependent on the design <br /> guidelines met and the quality of open space. <br /> A question was asked about whether the septic tank "lot yield" <br /> would apply if the site had water and sewer service - i.e. , if the <br /> starting point for density bonuses in the Staff Alternative would <br /> still be the site constraint-based lot yield with water and sewer <br /> service. I responded that, except in the Hillsborough Cooperative <br /> Planning Area "Open Space Area", the lot yield would still be the <br /> starting point for open-space development density bonuses (in the <br /> Staff Alternative only) . I further noted that in the Hillsborough <br /> "Open Space Area", however, these standards and densities would <br /> likely be modified as part of a future joint land use plan. <br /> I should have noted that the "Staff Alternative" already addresses <br /> this issue. As a part of the footnotes of the Staff Alternative <br /> from March 10, 1993, the following statement is found: <br /> 114 . In the Hillsborough Open Space Area, property owners, because <br /> of the availability of public water and sewer, would start at <br /> or u1E;t ';pzt` ae, since densities of less than that would <br /> make. .it difficult to justify the cost of public utility <br /> extension. <br />