Orange County NC Website
68 <br /> The above standards were deliberately worded to be flexible to protect the carrying <br /> capacity of the street and limit the number of access points from each lot. This <br /> flexibility is needed because of existing lots which currently front on Old N.C. 86, <br /> some which have no other means of access because of floodplains and other <br /> environmental constraints; i.e., steep slopes adjacent to the street right-of-way. <br /> Planning Board We join/support the staff'comment. <br /> Comment: (VOTE: Unanimous, 11-0.) <br /> 3. Consider phasing of implementation of prezoned areas to coincide with the extension of sewer <br /> service.The character of development without sewer may preempt the type of development that <br /> we desire. <br /> Staff Comment: On pages 2.4.22, 2.4.23, and 2.4.25, a map and teat describe the availability of sewer <br /> to the I.40/Old N.C.86 district. A proposed 12-inch sewer line is to be completed by <br /> the end of 1994 which would terminate (via a stub-out) where Cates Creek crosses I- <br /> 85. Service to the I-40/Old N.C. 86 district can be provided by extension of this line. <br /> Phasing of the development of the district to coincide with the availability of this <br /> sewer line would mean that the northeast quadrant of the interchange would occur <br /> first,followed(in order) by the northwest quadrant,the southwest quadrant, and the <br /> southeast quadrant.If property owners have no other means of developing their land <br /> until sewer service is available, this would mean that some areas would not be <br /> developed for 20-30 years. <br /> One alternative is to use pump stations and force mains as an interim solution until <br /> the major gravity line along Cates Creek is extended. In lieu of this approach, <br /> property owners could be allowed to develop with septic tanks. In terms of such <br /> development pre-empting the types of development desired,,the criteria in the Design <br /> Manual insure that all development, whether served by septic tanks or public sewer, <br /> are subject to the same standards. One result,however, will be that businesses using <br /> septic tanks will be required to provide greater land area for nitrification fields. <br /> One consideration might be to require that property owners design septic systems so <br /> that connection to public sewer would be possible once extended. In the case of large <br /> lots to be subdivided,it could mean installing"dry sewer"or sewer lines in the streets <br /> or easements which would not be used until major sewer lines were extended and <br /> connection could be made.For alternative systems,they could either be prohibited or <br /> approved only under the"planned development"process. <br /> Planning Hoard We support prezoning to allow development in all areas regardless of sewer <br /> Comment extension and encourage the laying of"dry"sewer lines for future connection to major <br /> trunk lines,at the time of site development,where septic systems are used.Incentives <br /> from utility providers, such as the waiver of tap-on fees or assessments, should be <br /> used to promote the installation of dry sewer lines. <br /> (VOTE: Unanimous, 11-0.) <br /> 4. Residential uses in Secondary Area of I-40 10ld N.C.86. <br /> a. Consider malting residential uses special uses. <br /> Staff Comment See "b" below. <br />