Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 03-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2015 11:56:54 AM
Creation date
2/9/2015 10:53:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940301
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
58 <br /> Cantrell noted support for the installation of dry <br /> sewer system. She felt it could be done in the <br /> initial stages at a fairly moderate cost and would <br /> not implicate the County or the present or future <br /> landowner to tear up something already there to <br /> install lines. <br /> Waddell stated that he felt the language should be <br /> such to encourage, as opposed to a requirement, <br /> because it will be an economic decision. Cantrell <br /> responded that she would be more on the side of <br /> requiring because it is going to be extra expense. <br /> It's a forward motion. <br /> Jobsis stated that subcommittees had discussed the <br /> issue of dry lines. The group had concerns that the <br /> original owner may not be the owner twenty years <br /> into the future and uses could change. There are a <br /> lot of things that cannot be totally controlled. <br /> She did not feel that the added expense of <br /> installing dry sewer lines could be required, but, <br /> rather agreed with the term encourage. <br /> Cantrell stated agreement in the same manner in <br /> which road standards have been done with "an eye <br /> with what is coming down the road next" ; not trying <br /> to necessarily maintain a viable general outlook. <br /> She felt if it was not required, no one would do it. <br /> Waddell noted that if zoning was not implemented <br /> until sewer lines were in place, and that might not <br /> occur for some time, then zoning would be delayed. <br /> He felt that was not in line with the sense of the <br /> Board. He felt the Board was in agreement with the <br /> staff comments and the alternative of dry sewers. <br /> He felt the Board would like to allow for <br /> development in all the areas and not pre-zone <br /> piecemeal. <br /> Cantrell suggested a show of hands to determine <br /> whether the term encourage or require should be used <br /> in terms of dry sewer systems. Waddell agreed. <br /> Hoecke stated that he felt that the intent was to <br /> prezone all of the areas at the same time. <br /> It was the consensus of the Board to encourage <br /> rather than require the installation of dry sewer <br /> lines. <br /> Consideration #4: <br /> Consider making residential uses special uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.