Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 03-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2015 11:56:54 AM
Creation date
2/9/2015 10:53:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940301
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
53 <br /> Collins noted again that I-85/US 70 District has the <br /> widest range of uses principally because of two <br /> factors. The way it has developed historically and <br /> the uses that are already in place. <br /> Collins continued his presentation by addressing the <br /> considerations referred by Commissioner Willhoit, <br /> noting that all of his questions or considerations <br /> pertain to the I-40/Old NC 86 Economic Development <br /> District. The first question from Commissioner <br /> Willhoit was whether to consider permitted <br /> manufacturing uses from the I-40/Old NC 86 node, or <br /> at least making them special uses. Collins referred <br /> to a listing of manufacturing uses permitted (an <br /> attachment to these minutes on page ) and <br /> indicated those permitted in comparable Durham <br /> Zoning Districts. Wherever the word "Yes" is used, <br /> that reflects the effort to model this district <br /> after the research application or RTP restrictive <br /> covenants. Generally, when the word "No" is used, <br /> that is to reflect uses that exist in the County. <br /> One example of that is paperboard container boxes, <br /> Mebane Packaging, which is in Mebane's jurisdiction <br /> but, is actually in Orange County. Collins noted <br /> that comments heard about Mebane Packaging did not <br /> indicate reasons why it would be objectionable for <br /> such a use in this district. <br /> Collins referred to the miscellaneous permitted uses <br /> noting that while they do not already exist in <br /> Orange County, staff discussion indicated they felt <br /> there would be no opposition to those uses. It was <br /> felt that they would not generate any real adverse <br /> impacts either in terms of byproducts or lots of <br /> truck traffic or a large number of employees. <br /> Collins asked that the Board remember that any <br /> reference to Special Use means a Planned Development <br /> approval process; rezoning, special use and site <br /> plan all in one process. When "Special Use" is <br /> -written out, it is always in the Planned Development <br /> application context. <br /> The decision that confronts the Planning Board is <br /> whether you feel this list of permitted uses is <br /> acceptable. If the desire is to limit the I-40/Old <br /> NC 86 district to an office/distribution center with <br /> limited retail, either eliminating manufacturing <br /> uses or requiring them to obtain a special use <br /> permit through the "planned development" is an <br /> option. If there is a concern that the range of <br /> possible uses is still too open and requires closer <br /> scrutiny, approval through the "planned development" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.