Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 03-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2015 11:56:54 AM
Creation date
2/9/2015 10:53:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940301
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> 306F REVERE ROAD 48 <br /> HILLSBOROUGH, :NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br /> u!. <br /> FAX MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Commissioner Alice Gordon <br /> FAX NO: (919) 9677-�-31823. <br /> FROM: Marvin lanning�Director <br /> FAX NO: (919) 644-3002 <br /> SUBJECT: Economic Development Districts <br /> NUMBER OF PAGES: 3 <br /> DATE: February 14, 1994 <br /> COPIES: Board of County Commissioners <br /> John Link, County Manager <br /> Geoffrey Gledhill, County Attorney <br /> Ted Abernathy, Economic Development Director <br /> Provided below are answers to your February 3, 1994 FAX <br /> A. I-85Buckhorn Road Economic Development District <br /> 1. LAND USE <br /> a. Does any of the proposed Economic Development node lie outside the current Commercial- <br /> Industrial node?YES.What is the designation for the current node?CH-2,MILES NORTH. <br /> b. If the answer to a.above is"yes",then what is the current land use designation of that"extra" <br /> area? 10-YEAR TRANSITION. <br /> C. If the answer to a.above is"m", then is any land currently in the node to be excluded from <br /> the new E¢anamic Development node?ALTHOUGH THE ANSWER TO a.IS"NO",NONE <br /> OF THE REMAINING LAND IN THE COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL NODE IS <br /> PROPOSED FOR CHANGE IN TERMS OF LAND USE DESIGNATION. <br /> 2. ZONING <br /> a. What are the current zoning designations of the land within the current Commercial-Industrial <br /> node? R-1 RESIDENTIAL,OFFICE is INSTITUTIONAL,EXISTING COMMERCIAL <br /> b, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL-3, AND INDUSTRIAL-1. THE OVERLAY <br /> DISTRICTS OF MTC (MAJOR TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AND U-ENO-PW <br /> (UPPER ENO PROTECTED WATERSHED ALSO APPLY. <br /> b. If the new Economic Development node includes more land than the current node, what are <br /> the current zoning categories for that extra land? THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br /> DISTRICT DOES NOT INCLUDE MORE LAND THAN THE CURRENT NODE.FOR <br /> THE LAND IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHICH LIES <br /> OUTSIDE THE CURRENT NODE,THE CURRENT ZONING IS R-1 RESIDENTIAL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.