Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 03-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-01-1994 - VII-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2015 11:56:54 AM
Creation date
2/9/2015 10:53:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19940301
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Points to Pander - CcruQn <br /> Throughout the manual, terms such as 4wheraver possiblad and 'where <br /> Rroctical' meke the standards fuzzy and as a result there is a lot of staff <br /> judgment involved in deciding whether or nct the standards have osen met. <br /> S. Mixing of Objective Standards and 'Fuzzy' Standards <br /> Objective standards ;a.g. setback requirements) and fuizV standards are <br /> mixed together in a taxtbook-iiks format. <br /> C. Comments/Quests Ono/RtcommondstIons <br /> 1. who will make the judgments required to implement the desigr, <br /> guidelines? will additional staff be required? will they be trained as <br /> architects? <br /> 2. How will the Design Manuel gat changed? Will the DaCC need to <br /> approve changes? In other words, how doss the Design Manuel work in <br /> relation to the Zoning Ordinance and any other land use regulations? <br /> 3. it would appear that the Design Manuel should be mods more <br /> concise and Mors objscttvs. The fuzzy standards should be separated from <br /> the objective standards, so that everyone can more easily ascertain what <br /> is required. <br /> 111. Costs <br /> Ons important question is wfwther the Economic Development Districts <br /> will be of benef It.to the county financially. This on several aspects to <br /> t;iis question. <br /> A. Wetsr and Sower Ssrvies. <br /> One important concern 1s who will provide the water and sewer infre- <br /> 4tructure for the economic development districts. What will the <br /> provision of water end.sewer cost? Who will pay for it? Of particular <br /> note is the statement that future tower tine extensions for the <br /> legnuckhorn nods are ayssiols from the Eflend sewer system. (Sea the <br /> Anelysis and Evaluation section for this node in the December 6 OOCC <br /> Packet) What about connecting to the system in Alamonce County? <br /> D. TransportatieA <br /> As with water end sewer service, we need to know how transportation <br /> facilities will be provided and who will pay for them. Will there be public <br /> transportation facilities so that worksrs can get to their jobs without <br /> relying exclusively on the automobile? <br /> C. C48t/1148011t Anelysls <br /> Evan if the @CCC will not require a cost/benefit analysis before eoproving <br /> EconzmtC Development-DistMc*". we nerd to decide now what kind of <br /> arelysts wilt be required later. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.