Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-2008-3a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 04-01-2008
>
Agenda - 04-01-2008-3a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:40:25 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:55:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080401
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
RES-2008-024 Turkey Farm Road Bridge Resolution
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />3. Conduct an environmental assessment process required for projects that may impact <br />species identified on the National Endangered Species list, including a field meeting with <br />qualified ecologists to ensure demolition, construction and final design of the bridge will have <br />no negative impacts on the high level of aquatic species habitat, water quality, and other <br />natural heritage features of the New Hope Creek area. <br />Bridge Design Revised: <br />The County has previously forwarded to NCDOT a letter outlining the concerns raised by the <br />NHCCAC. In response, the NCDOT has revised the design to remove interior bents and <br />associated 55-foot rip-rap causeway in the .streambed. The existing structure has two bents <br />(one of either side) at the stream edge. Bents for the new structure will be outside the water <br />channel on the dry bank area, which eliminates the need for rock causeway. The concrete piers <br />of the existing bridge will remain because removing those would cause disturbance of the <br />streambed. <br />Orange County's Transportation Advisory Committee member has also brought these concerns <br />to the attention of the NCDOT Division 7 Board of Transportation member at a meeting to <br />discuss the Transportation Improvement Program. <br />The following address the three requests stated in the resolution: <br />1. NCDOT Structure Design has considered a bridge that would allow for an under bridge <br />pedestrian trail. Such structure would require a bridge span in excess of 200-feet and would <br />add another span, doubling the cost of the project and extending completion of the project <br />two-three years because of additional studies needed for design and right-of-way <br />requirements. (The 2005 estimate for the bridge replacement was $737,000.) The New <br />Hope Corridor Open Space Master Plan, adopted in April 1991, calls for a wildlife corridor, <br />but does not propose a pedestrian trail along this part of the creek. The Master Recreation <br />and Parks Work Group recommendations, adopted by the BOCC in April 2000, calls for rural <br />trails links fora "North Chapel Hill/Rural Buffer corridor linking Booker Creek Greenway, <br />Northern Community Park, Duke Forest, New Hope Creek (including TLC lands and Duke <br />Forest) back to the New Hope Creek Corridor and the Durham County line." <br />NCDOT intends to replace the bridge with a 28-foot wide structure that includes two 10-foot <br />lanes with 4-foot offsets and bicycle safe rails, maintaining the low chord (approximately the <br />same roadway grade as the existing structure). The existing bridge is lower than the 100- <br />yearflood elevation. The Orange County Floodplain Administrator approved a "No Rise/No <br />Impact "certification for the bridge because the design called for the deck to be slightly <br />below the 100-year flood, but allowed more flood water to pass underneath. than does the <br />existing bridge due to the new design's increased transverse open area under the bridge. <br />There is no evidence that the existing structure causes floodwater to backup upstream, so <br />the proposed new structure should not cause floodwater to backup for the above stated <br />reason. To raise the bridge, the superstructure must clear the 25-year (design year) and <br />100-year (base flood) water surface elevations, and have much deeper foundations, more <br />land clearance and disturbance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.