Orange County NC Website
1 <br /> Board of Commissioners 1/18/94 Meeting 4 <br /> . <br /> L% 3 <br /> will be replaced with the words "University Station". <br /> The map will be revised to show only that area being considered for <br /> the proposed University Station project. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Insko, seconded by Chair Carey <br /> to approve the changes as stated above which includes the change in wording <br /> of Section 3 (a) , the name of the resolution and the map. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> COUNTY FINANCINGS FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION UNDER NCa8 SECTION 160A- <br /> 20 <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Halkiotis to approve a resolution requesting that the Orange County <br /> legislative delegation introduce and support legislation authorizing Orange <br /> County to finance school construction under Section 160A-20 of the North <br /> Carolina General Statutes as stated below: <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> VI. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE <br /> VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> ,A. PETITION FOR ABANDONMENT - RIGHT-OF-WAY IN HIDEAWAY ESTATES <br /> SUBDIVISION <br /> This item was presented to conduct a public hearing on the order <br /> to close a right-of-way located off Hideaway Drive in Section Three of <br /> Hideaway Estates Subdivision. A property owner in Hideaway Estates <br /> Subdivision has submitted a petition to close a right-of-way located between <br /> lots 13 of block D and lot 1 of block E in Section Three of Hideaway Estates <br /> Subdivision. The reasons for this abandoning are listed in the agenda <br /> abstract. <br /> THERE WERE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Insko, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Halkiotis to approve the proposed order as stated below: <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> H. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS PUBLIC HEARING <br /> This item was presented to receive citizen comments on a proposed <br /> Design Manual containing performance standards and design criteria applicable <br /> with proposed Economic Development Districts as described in the agenda <br /> abstract. Since there was not a quorum of the Planning Board, the comments <br /> received below will be entered into the record of the February 1, 1994 regular <br /> meeting. <br /> CITIZEN COMMENTS ARE LISTED BELOW: <br /> CARL WALTERS spoke in support of commercial and industrial development <br /> in the Efland Cheeks area. He does not feel that the pay scale for new <br /> businesses will cause residential growth. He noted that Mebane has lots of <br />