Agenda - 01-18-1994-IX-D - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

121a�1�3 W hvic,S 21 a reasonable request and it had been indicated that it could not be granted because it would be breaking the rules. However, it seemed as if the Board was being asked to make an exception in this case. She was concerned with the apparent unfair treatment. Waiters responded that there was one difference between this request and Mr. Compton's request. The applicant in this case had paid the required fees and requested rezoning. She continued that this was twice that Mr. Compton had refused to pay the appropriate fees and request a rezoning. Willis responded that no action could be taken on the request, mace by Mr. Compton at this time. It is an item that would have to be presented at public hearing before a decision could be made. Waddell suggested that, despite the finding that the roads are not arterial or collectors, that an exception be made in this case because the general intent is positive. He felt the Board should go with the general intent which is right and just. Cantrell asked if the ordinance requires that vehicular access be found. Kirk stated that the wording in the ordinance is that "the district will usually be applied where the following conditions exist' . Waddell noted that he felt a replacement motion was in order. MOTION: Waddell moved that, despite the Planning Board's earlier finding that the property is not connected to arterials and collectors, that this rezoning request be approved. Seconded by Jobsis. Waddell stated he had concerns, but, that this proposed development is consistent with development in that particular area. Eidenier noted that she would be voting in the negative due to her concern with the issue of safety. She continued that she hoped the concern would be heard and could help to obtain a reduction in the speed limit. VOTE: 9 in favor. 1 opposed (Eidenier - for reasons already stated) . (2 ) Z-9-93 First South Bank, Inc. Presentation by Eddie Kirk.