Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-31-2008-4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 03-31-2008
>
Agenda - 03-31-2008-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 9:55:32 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/31/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080331
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At the February meeting County staff was also asked to draft a set of guiding principles <br />and parameters for enacting the conservation easements. Conceptually these guiding <br />principles and parameters could apply equally to the 85.9 jointly held acres and the 60 <br />acres held solely the County. In working through this issue in anticipation of discussion <br />at or before the Assembly of Governments meeting, County staff was advised and has <br />received an opinion from the County Attorney to the BOCC of the need for the County <br />and Towns to specifically address changing the designation of the 60 acre parcel since <br />there is nothing in the Agreement or the Amendment that provides for reimbursement to <br />the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund in the event the 60 acre parcel is not used for landfill <br />system purposes. <br />In recent months, discussions have been held with Triangle Land Conservancy about <br />holding the conservation easement(s) and the likely parameters and nature of the <br />easements. This includes sharing the new ideas about a potential school site and <br />recreational fields in conjunction with the affordable housing area. TLC remains <br />interested in holding the easement(s) on the open space lands, and will use fature site <br />planning discussions and efforts to develop a stewardship endowment request to the local <br />governments (to address long -term management costs). <br />A copy of the March 14 2008 letter from the County Attorney, the draft uig ding <br />principles and parameters for the conservation easements and the Inter Local Agreement <br />and Amendment are attached. <br />Further Direction Requested <br />This update is presented as background to the discussion and further direction by the <br />elected officials of the three jurisdictions to County and Town management at the <br />Assembly of Governments meeting on March 31 sc <br />As outlined, a reimbursement scenario inclusive of the County held 60 acres has already <br />been circulated. However, another potential amendment to the Solid Waste Interlocal <br />Agreement would alter these funding shares. A possible school site, without foreclosing <br />affordable housing opportunities, has met with favorable preliminary reviews. Guiding <br />principles and parameters for the conservation easements are submitted here in draft <br />form. The County Attorney has advised that the Inter Local Agreement may be amended <br />as required to reflect any changes in policy direction the three jurisdictions may wish to <br />make: <br />The elected bodies of the three jurisdictions are requested to give guidance and feedback <br />to their staff on next steps in implementing a recommended concept plan for joint <br />ownership and reimbursement, in recognition of implications for the existing Inter Local <br />Agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.