Agenda - 01-10-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

A final thoroughfare improvement noted in section 2.1 was the proposed Eno Drive extension from Durham.Also known as The Case Study- the Northwest Loop,the project is intended to relieve traffic Roadway Design& congestion in and around the urban areas north and east of lmpmOments Durham.The western terminus of the four-lane facility would V CAWWtt°1 fOCS be at a new interchange with 1-85 approximately 1,000 feet Off=buuila0irtp dlimerrsions 45 ft.x 55 ft west of the Durham County line. In the DCH C Thoroughfare WrWr of straries 2 Plan,the road is planned for extension to connect with Nwnberofofftekfik rtes 2 U.S.Highway 70 immediately across from N.C. Highway 751. Offace&uiloPr"tp floor area 2,475$9.ft Total fibor area 9,900 sq.ft. Bike lanes are proposed as part of the Eno Drive project; ARM e.g.,four-foot lanes on the edge of the outside vehicle travel Effpabyeesper 1,000 sq.ft. 3.39 lane. In addition, N.C.Highway 751 is another thoroughfare of tntatl fidorareat designated in the Regional Bicycle Plan as a bike route. If the Total effro+ovees 34 Eno Drive project is extended to U.S. Highway 70, the bike ITE Tnb Generation Hates lanes are to be extended to connect with those proposed for (Vehicle tfW per efriabyee) N.C. Highway 751. A veratge waakal3ty 5.32 —A.M.Peak hour 0.70 Roadway DesignAmprovement (One hour between 7 and 9 A.M.) — P.M.Peak hour 0.79 During the design phase of each project in an Economic (One hour between 4 and 6 P.M.) Development District,an analysis of the proposed developments impact on increased traffic flow must be TraAv Genereeka (Vehicle trao�s) prepared. Specific*,a Traffic Impact Study is required and —A vera�ge weekday lei A.M. Peak haw. 24 must be submitted with the comprehensive site development 83%Ente►trtp 21 plan if the traffic generated by a development exceeds 800 1 t%Exitartp 3 trips per day. Specifications for the preparation of the Study, — P.M.Peak hour 27 including levels of service,are contained in Article 13 of the 17X Enteft s 93X Exit>i v 22 Zoning Ordinance. ExistrV Traffic VOAKM 8,300 In all cases,roadways and/or signalized intersections must be (lSes AD ) designed to maintain adequate service levels and assure user PrgectedDevekprnentADT let safety. Highway design and siting must respond to present TotaIADT 8,481 and projected capacity/volume deficiencies as identified in the StrvvtADTGapacity 10,000 Traffic Impact Study;e.g.,existing streets adjacent to a proposed development must be upgraded and improved when Since total prg0ctedADT does not such improvements are made necessary by increased traffic exceed cagoacity of street,no flow from the development. rirfwvvements are reputled except aal final rtht-of-way de&atibn Whether improvements are required or not,adequate and buAft setbacks from new right-of-way must be dedicated to accommodate the r4ht-of--way Airre. projected right-of-way requirements as identified in adopted Ecor=nk Devekprnent Distracts Des07 MarxW PaVe 3.3.r2