Orange County NC Website
Developers feared <br /> that the study <br /> would lead to <br /> residential assessed value; the median I ! increases. For both the county as a <br /> residential property tax levy; and the I higher impact tees, whole and the smaller units within it, <br /> jratio of the tax code area to total mu- 1 there are many reasons why the two <br /> 1 I growth controls • <br /> nicipal assessed value. I g phenomena might occur simultane- ; <br /> Even though the study carefully oush%Below are several possible expla- <br /> stated that it did not point to nonresi- or a two-tiered tax nations; some may be unique to Du- <br /> dential development as the cause of Page County, but others may occur <br /> assessment system. <br /> counav tax increases,observers widely elsewhere as well. <br /> i t <br /> perceived the investigation as doing <br /> just that. In fact, the study declared ment to review all the studies and cri- Loss of revenue from other sources <br /> that"a one percent increase in nonres- tiques.'We concluded that the original Some taxing bodies in DuPage may i <br /> idential development is likely to result study was adequate for an exploratory have had to increase property taxes <br /> in a tax levy increase that is three times effort, though not as a "conclusive more rapidly than others to offset larg- <br /> larger than a similar one percent in- study." er revenue losses associated with other, <br /> crease in residential development." For instance, the 1986-1989 study nonpropemr-based sources. Our pre- j <br /> This was attributed to two effects of period was largely atypical in that it liminary investigation suggests that <br /> nonresidential development:the addi- embraced the height of the building lost revenue is an important factor for <br /> tional workers, shoppers, and others boom. In addition,the results of the DuPage County as a whole compared <br /> i <br /> who demand new services, and resi- study are somewhat difficult to inter- to other suburban Chicago counties;it <br /> dents'increased demand for more ser- pret because of the particular variables may also differentiate individual tax- <br /> vices and amenities as an area urban- selected for analysis. For example, ing bodies within DuPage.A large part <br /> izes. rather than comparing tax rates, the of this revenue loss is attributable to a <br /> Responses to the DuPage Study study used the total tax levy as the de- reduction in state school aid. Given <br /> pendent variable.In fact,as an area de- that school aid is distributed to indi- I <br /> �he development community reacted velops, the total levy inevitably rises; vidual school districts on the basis of <br /> _. to the study with outrage. Developers the expectation is that rates will de- local tax effort,districts with large in- I j <br /> feared that the study would lead to cline. Further, the study's measure of creases in their tax base (due, in part, <br /> higher impact fees,growth controls,or nonresidential development was to nonresidential development) prob- <br /> a two-tiered tax assessment system somewhat indirect; it counted the ably received reduced aid and thus had <br /> such as that imposed by neighboring number of firms rather than,say,the to increase their property tax levy <br /> Cook County. That system assesses square footage devoted to nonresiden- more than districts without nonresi- <br /> nonresidential real estate at two and tial uses. Given that various types of dential development. <br /> one-half times the rate of residential development were measured in differ- <br /> proper.In response,the DuPage De- ent units(number of firms versus resi- Lowered tax price <br /> m <br /> velopment Council retained North- dential assessed value),analysts cannot The larger the proportion of the tax I <br /> western University's Professor Edwin accurately compare the results of the base that is nonresidential, the less <br /> Mills, one of the pioneers of urban regression analysis and conclude that costly it is for residents to demand <br /> economics,to write a critique;at the one variable has a three times greater more services and thus increase public <br /> request of the DuPage Association of effect than another. expenditures. The reason is that the <br /> Realtors,the University of Illinois Of- But,even assuming that the empiri- "tax price" (i.e.,the share of the costs <br /> Fite of Real Estate Research issued a re- cal findings are basically correct,it is of local services borne by the average <br /> port with a strongly worded attack; still difficult to conclude that nonresi- household) for government services <br /> and other groups brought in experts dential development brings about in- demanded by DuPage residents may <br /> from the University of Chicago and creased property taxes.The simultane- have declined because of the growth of <br /> Harvard University to denounce the ous occurrence of high rates of non- the commercial tax base.This hypoth- <br /> study's assumptions, methodology, residential growth and increasing tax esis fits with the finding that areas with <br /> data,and conclusions. levies does not necessarily imply that a high nonresidential tax base experi- <br /> Seeking to bring some reason to the the costs of development lead to tax ence increases in the total tax levy.The <br /> i,debate,the East West Corporate Cor- <br /> ridor Association, a coalition of major I Il .hwqucnt section o f t his article a hand un the rel—n ktid tstifte 1 hvvinpwrrr,trni llrvptriy 74,vcs m th+J'u c ' <br /> /t Cmmry Frmd Report h% John McDonald.Charles Orlehcke,Ashish 4n.and Wim Wic%vrl,Cemer for Urban <br /> corporations in the county, retained P <br /> E.corn:rnic Development.University of Illinois at Chicafiu.Chicago,ivy .A sum mars of the stuJc arl+cared earlier <br /> the U niversity of Illinois at Chicago's in wtm Ww-cl et al.,-Commercial Uevclopmcnt and),rupertl•Taxes:Who Pars the It ills?". Public hnx•stm 1, <br /> I Center for Urban Economic Develop- Anscrrcan Planning Association.1.3:March I9142. <br /> i <br /> 12 Land DevelopmentlSpring-Summer 1993 j <br /> w <br />