Orange County NC Website
l <br /> Residential Build-Out Example.The residential build-out example assumes that the 112-acre quadrant would <br /> be rezoned and developed in a manner similar to the Cornwallis Hills Subdivision. As shown below, the net fiscal <br /> impact in year 10 of a 10-year buildout period would be - $71,935. <br /> RESIDENTIAL BUILD-OUT EXAMPLE <br /> Total Acreage (Acres) 112.0 <br /> Less: 15% for Street Right-of-Way 16.8 <br /> Net Development Area (Acres) 95.2 <br /> Net Development Area (Square Feet) 4,146,912.0 <br /> Average Lot Size (Square Feet) 16,500.0 <br /> Net Number of Homes 251 <br /> @ 10-Year Buildout (Homes Per Year) 25 <br /> Average Sales Price Per Home $129,20 <br /> Net Fiscal Impact in Year 10 @ 10-Year Build-Out -$71,935 <br /> (See Attachment D - Residential Case Study for detail) <br /> Non-Residential Build-Out Example. In this example, the fiscal impact data dervived from the analysis of <br /> Parker-Hannifin, Vietri, and the Eastowne office building are used to project the impact of a mixed use <br /> development on the same 112-acre tract.To arrive at comparative numbers,however,assumptions had to be made <br /> as to the absorption rates of office, distribution, and light industrial uses into the market. The absorption rates <br /> as well as the equivalent number of office, distribution,and manufacturing buildings is shown in the table below. <br /> ABSORPTION RATE <br /> NON-RESIDENTIAL USE (SQFT/YEAR) BUILDING EQUIVALENT <br /> Manufacturing/Parker-Hannifin 300,000 SgFt 4 Plants <br /> Distribution/Vietri 300,000 SgFt 10 Buildings <br /> Office/Eastowne 150,000 SgFt 9 Buildings <br /> Using the building"equivalents"derived above as well as information obtained about each site during the site-by- <br /> site investigations,the 112-acre tract was developed with fiscal impacts resulting as shown on the following page. <br /> When comparing the fiscal impact of non-residential development (+$169,460)with that of the residential impact <br /> (471,936 or an average of$287 per dwelling unit),the difference of+$97,525 may provide some indication of the <br /> relative "benefits" of one use in comparison to another. <br />