Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
i * <br /> 14 r <br /> i <br /> I <br /> 5 <br /> 1 mandated watershed protection standards . The items below are related <br /> 2 to the watershed protection provisions and the zoning of Little River <br /> 3 and Cedar Grove Townships:. Seven additional existing business have <br /> 4 been identified in Little River and Cedar Grove Townships since the <br /> 5 August public hearing. The Tables located in the permanent agenda <br /> 6 file in 'the Cleric's office list all of the parcels proposed to be <br /> 7 rezoned to a non-residential zoning district with the zoning of Little <br /> 8 River and Cedar Grove Townships . The State mandate allows a non- <br /> 9 residential impervious surface limit of :lox in a portion of WS-II <br /> 10 watersheds without construction of detention ponds, provided that <br /> 11 residential development in excess of 1 dwelling unit per acre does not <br /> 12 occur . If residential density for any project exceeds I du/acre , then <br /> 13 both residential and non-residential dev4lopments which exceed 12% <br /> 14 impervious surface are required to construct detention ponds . <br /> 15 1 <br /> 16 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR COMMENTS/QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF <br /> 17 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .AND THE PLANNING BOARD' <br /> 18 <br /> 19 PLANNING BOARD CHAIR CAROL CANTRELL mentioned that citizens need <br /> 20 to come forward and have all current uses iincluded. The process after <br /> 21 adoption of the amendments will be time lconsuming and cumbersome. <br /> 22 Prior to adoption , established uses will be added automatically . <br /> 23 After January 1st, all uses not , listed will be considered non- <br /> 24 conforming. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 CHAIR MOSES CAREY commented that the season Back Creek Watershed <br /> 27 is on the agenda is that it is the only development currently allowing <br /> 28 one unit per acre . <br /> 29 <br /> 30 COMMISSIONER ALICE GORDON asked thaL the two watersheds be <br /> 31 clearly listed as allowing the high density option . <br /> 32 <br /> 33 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR OUESTIONS/C MMENTS FROM CITIZENS. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 None. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 s Zoning Atlas Am2ndments <br /> 38 (c) Z-8-93101d ,86 Limited Partnership <br /> 39 This item was presented by Eddie Kirk for the purpose of <br /> 40 receiving. citizen comment on, a proposed Zoning Atlas amendment. The <br /> 41 property in question is located southwest of Cornwallis Hills <br /> 42 ',SLd')div1sion and will have access to Oakdale Drive (SR 1133) and Old <br /> 43 OChapel Hill.-Hillsborough Road (SR 1009) through Cornwallis Hills . The <br /> 44 total area proposed for rezoning contains 48 .68 acres and is described <br /> 45 as Lot 1 , Block C of Tax Map 42 in Hillsborou8h Township. In the <br /> 46 adopted Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan , the property is <br /> 47 designated Ten Year Transition . The current zoning is Residential-1 <br /> 48 (R-1 ). The zoning district proposed isl Residential-4 (R-4 ) . A <br /> 49 portion of the property is in the Transportation Corridor (MTC ) <br /> 50 overlay district. Adjacent property to the south and west is zoned <br /> 51 Residential-1 and undeveloped. CornwallisiHills subdivision is north <br /> 52 and east, which is zoned Residential-3 (R-3 The property will have <br /> RECEIVED FROM 919 644 3004 P. 3 <br />