Browse
Search
Minutes 11-19-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 11-19-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 12:01:37 PM
Creation date
1/23/2015 4:45:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2014
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
Agenda - 11-19-2014 - 6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-19-2014 - Assembly of Governments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
though it may be cheaper in some areas than others, you still might have much higher <br /> transportation costs in some of these areas, which is not what anyone wants. <br /> Council Member Matt Czajkowski said he disagreed with Alderman Johnson. He said <br /> the direction this is moving toward is for all of the jurisdictions to provide funding for the CHT, <br /> whereas it has historically only been Chapel Hill. He said the fundamental question is why <br /> Orange County should fund this if most of it is happening in Chapel Hill. <br /> Mayor Kleinschmidt said the funding would be proportional to where the homes are, so <br /> Chapel Hill would pay more. <br /> Alderman Chaney said Carrboro has an affordable housing strategy, and there was a <br /> meeting about the inter-local agreement. She said it would be nice to see in the agreement <br /> the proportion of funds that CHT is raising itself. <br /> Alderman Chaney said Robert Dowling is part of the Orange County affordable housing <br /> coalition, which is a group of about a dozen providers with some sort of role in affordable <br /> housing in Orange County. She said this coalition would be very interested in the question of <br /> the County's combined goals. She suggested that everyone think about being better listeners <br /> to that coalition. <br /> Mayor Kleinschmidt said he hopes that everyone will state their commitments strongly <br /> on the night when votes are taken to adopt these recommendations. He worries that future <br /> board members approving homes for the CHT will become concerned with the increased <br /> percentage of operational expenses that they are being required to pay, and this will be a <br /> disincentive. He hopes that each of the individual boards can employ whatever processes <br /> they might have to diminish that possibility. <br /> b. Transit-Related Affordable Housinq Opportunities <br /> David Bonk said this is an update on efforts being made to try and incorporate issues <br /> of affordable housing into the planning related to the light rail corridor between Durham and <br /> Chapel Hill. He said there is a strong correlation between affordable housing, the cost of <br /> transportation, and the ability of public transit to offset a major portion of that cost. <br /> He said staff inembers in Chapel Hill have been in contact with Triangle Transit (TTA) <br /> and with counterparts in Durham to coordinate efforts related to station area planning. He said <br /> the stations that have been proposed in Chapel Hill are best characterized as a combination of <br /> UNC owned and/or greenfield sites. He said Durham has an even mix of greenfield station <br /> locations and inner city urban station areas, which carry a host of issues. <br /> David Bonk said the federal government recently announced a grant program that <br /> would be made available to support the development of station area plans around stations for <br /> projects that have reached a certain level of maturity in the federal process. He said Chapel <br /> Hill submitted a grant application and should hear back about this in March. He said this grant <br /> would fund $2.3 million worth of efforts to support station area planning on both sides of the <br /> corridor, and it will be a coordinated effort between Chapel Hill and Durham. <br /> He said one lesson that has been learned is that it is important to start planning early; <br /> however, this is an evolving situation, and the grant that has been submitted has several key <br /> work tasks. He said one of these is a market survey at each of the proposed stations to <br /> determine the usage. He said there is another work task that flows from this that would focus <br /> specifically on developing strategies and plans for affordable housing that is consistent with <br /> the overall goals of both Durham and Chapel Hill. <br /> David Bonk said staff is very hopeful about the possibility of getting this funding, which <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.