Browse
Search
Minutes 11-11-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 11-11-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:59:37 AM
Creation date
1/23/2015 4:40:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/11/2014
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-11-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-11-2014 - Work Session
Agenda - 11-11-2014 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-11-2014 - Work Session
Agenda - 11-11-2014 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-11-2014 - Work Session
Agenda - 11-11-2014 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-11-2014 - Work Session
Agenda - 11-11-2014 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 11-11-2014 - Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioners and the staff. <br /> Commissioner Gordon asked Craig Benedict if the County's fiscal impact analysis might <br /> be helpful to use here. <br /> Craig Benedict said the County's fiscal impact analysis is focused more on residential <br /> development, so it is not an appropriate model for non-residential developments. He said there <br /> are new models out there to look at the multiplier effect. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that would be helpful. <br /> Commissioner McKee referred to page 11, and he asked for more explanation of the <br /> public and private improvement status and how this would be measured. <br /> Ken Pennoyer said the public improvement status would be an update on the progress <br /> toward roadway and storm water improvements. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he understands that the improvements to the road make the <br /> redevelopment more likely, but the improvements to the road do not factor into an increase in <br /> tax revenue for the County. He asked how this is factored in with the performance report. <br /> Ken Pennoyer said the performance report is more an update on the milestones the <br /> Town has set for making progress on the project, and it will provide a snapshot of where road <br /> development is and how this affects the potential for other development in the area. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if the Town is preparing an exit strategy in the event that <br /> the County decides that the project is not meeting expectations. <br /> Ken Pennoyer said he is proposing that this decision be made on an annual basis during <br /> budget deliberations. He said part of this is based on the realization that money from new taxes <br /> has a lot of demands. He said the purpose of the performance report is to illustrate the fact that <br /> the project is creating value with regard to what was expected. He said the exit strategy would <br /> only be needed if the County decides it has a higher use of those funds. <br /> Commissioner McKee said this does not seem to align with the 20 year build out of this <br /> project. He said he would think that there would be some expectation of the County to see this <br /> through to the end. <br /> Ken Pennoyer said the town would like to see a 20 year commitment, but they <br /> understand that in order for that to make sense the project would need to perform and meet the <br /> needs of Orange County in terms of economic development. He said staff obviously feels that <br /> the project is going to meet the milestones in the development scenario, but they want to <br /> structure it in a way that gives the County a choice. <br /> Commissioner porosin said he wants to be clear. He said if these student projections <br /> are way off and there are actually more students coming in, the County could choose not to give <br /> the $400,000 to the project, and could allocate to the schools instead. He asked if this is an <br /> accurate assessment. <br /> Ken Pennoyer said that is the County's prerogative. <br /> Commissioner porosin asked about slide 12 and said it looks like the payment would <br /> only be less than the $400,000 in the first year. He said every other year it looks like the green <br /> block is the same size. <br /> Ken Pennoyer said this slide is based on a likely development scenario. He said the <br /> portion of the increment would be less than 50 percent of the debt service, and the town would <br /> make up the difference. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.