Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-27-2015 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 01-27-2015 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 01-27-2015 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2015 2:06:54 PM
Creation date
1/23/2015 11:17:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/27/2015
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-27-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 21, 2015 Attachment C 12 <br />6. Orange County Participation <br />Although many of the Best Management Practices (BMP's) to mitigate flood <br />conditions and as an added benefit reduce nutrient runoff may be relegated to <br />smaller scale case by case upstream retrofits, Orange County can <br />understand the benefits of flood control and water quality as it affects a larger <br />regional or sub - regional context. The social, health and emergency service <br />impact of flooding can impart a burden on the larger community. <br />Larger scale, publically sponsored flood /stormwater BMP's on public land or <br />easements that can ameliorate flood events is a potential joint participation <br />project. These projects often have environmental benefits also by enhancing <br />wetlands or recreating natural floodplains. <br />• Whereas certain development impacts have regional implications other than <br />human service, such as implementing the goals of nutrient reductions in <br />Jordan Lake or flood controls and burdens when residents are impacted by <br />flooding, Orange County respectfully makes the following suggestions for <br />project inclusion- <br />1 . Chapel Hill is encouraged to consider inclusion of state of the art peak <br />flow attenuation and best management practices ensuring post - <br />redevelopment reductions in both stormwater impacts and nutrients <br />(nitrogen and phosphorus), in addition to the normal State required <br />controls on suspended solids. <br />2. Consideration should be given to some stream restoration through the <br />property, re- establishing or creating floodplain benches to mitigate <br />flooding potential within the property, as well as providing benefits <br />upstream and downstream. At the very least, low- value, non - structural <br />improvements on these areas should be considered, such as use as <br />overflow parking. Perhaps some novel uses of permeable paving <br />technologies could be employed in such areas, with accommodation for <br />closure during anticipated periods of high stream flows. <br />3. Examine the location of stormwater and flood control BMP's whether on <br />public or private property and whether on -site, upstream or downstream. <br />Consider initial capital and ongoing regulated maintenance. <br />4. We are confident Chapel Hill will require minimum freeboard to occupied <br />floor space in those areas subject to flooding from the 100 -year storm. <br />Orange County encourages a minimum of 2 feet be considered, if not <br />already Chapel Hill's policy. <br />5. Flood storage at Eastwood Lake with telemetric flood control weirs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.