Orange County NC Website
<br />1 <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date:January 22, 2015 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No.6-h <br />SUBJECT: <br /> RevisedMemorandum of Agreementbetween the NC Sedimentation Control <br />Commission and Orange County <br />DEPARTMENT:PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) <br />Planning and InspectionsNo <br />ATTACHMENT(S):INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />1.Original Letter of Explanation from Howard W. Fleming, Jr., PE, <br />NCDENREngineering/Stormwater <br />2.Clarification Letterof Explanation Supervisor, 245-2586 <br />from NCDENRCraig Benedict, Planning Director, 245- <br />3.Current Memorandum of Agreement2592 <br />4.Revised Memorandum of AgreementJames Bryan, Staff Attorney, 245-2319 <br />to be Executed <br />PURPOSE: <br />To approve revisions tothecurrentMemorandum of Agreement(MOA)between <br />the Sedimentation Control Commission (SCC) and Orange County for the purpose of clarifying <br />roles in the enforcement of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, N.C. General <br />StatuteChapter 113A, Article4 and any rules adopted pursuant to the Act. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Orange County is responsible for enforcing the sedimentation control <br />standards issued by the Sedimentation Control Commission(the “SCC”)andadopted a local <br />program in 1975.The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act was amended in July 2011and <br />provided a model sedimentation control ordinancefor adoption by the local programs. The SCC <br />provided an associatedMOA which was approved by the BOCC onSeptember 6, 2012. It is <br />included as Attachment 3for informational purposes. However, the Board is being asked to <br />approve therevisedMOAcontained in Attachment 4. <br />As stated in the attached cover (Attachment 1) and clarification (Attachment 2) letters from <br />Ashley Rodgers, North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR) <br />State Sediment Specialist, the changes in the Revised MOA are targeted at the State <br />maintaining exclusive jurisdiction over oil and gas exploration and development. Ms. Rodgers <br />has also provided some clarifications by way of answers to some questions posed to her <br />outlining the primary differences of significance as follows: <br />1.Section II D, which adds a reference to North Carolina General Statute § 113A-56, even <br />though that statute has been in existence for years, but goes on to add exclusive <br />jurisdiction by the SCC over activities related to oil and gas exploration and development <br />on the well pad site. <br />2.Revised the reporting the Countymust make, formerly tothe Division of Water Quality <br />(DWQ), and nowto the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (DEMLR). <br /> <br />