Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2015 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
1/16/2015 3:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-22-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br />1 David Stancil said yes, that would be an easy thing to produce. <br />2 Chair Jacobs asked if the Lands Legacy update is done annually or every two years. <br />3 David Stancil said this is done every two to three years. <br />4 Commissioner Gordon thanked staff for this report. She referred to the table in the <br />5 report as compared to table 10 -1 on page 4 of the report and asked about the relationship <br />6 between these. <br />7 David Stancil said this shows the prioritization and some minor refinements. He said <br />8 staff was able to take a closer look at the projects, and there may have been one case in which <br />9 there was a cost adjustment. He noted that the projected total cost is a ball park estimate, and <br />10 it errs on the high side. <br />11 Commissioner Gordon asked if the Board would be adopting what is in the actual text. <br />12 David Stancil said the Board would be adopting the master plan itself, and the <br />13 supplemental report is just information for the Commissioners. He said this will be manifested <br />14 through the capital investment plan, which is looked at every year. <br />15 Commissioner McKee said he is curious about the metrics used to determine some of <br />16 the numbers, especially the number of 35,000 to 40,000 visitors for Cedar Grove Park. <br />17 David Stancil said Cedar Grove Park does not have the capability of counting heads <br />18 because residents can walk into that park, even when it is closed. He said this number is an <br />19 estimate based on activity, and it is probably driven by the fact that Hillsborough Youth Athletic <br />20 Association (HYAA) uses that facility from April to October. <br />21 <br />22 PUBLIC COMMENT: <br />23 Allan Green is a member of the Parks and Recreation Council, as well as a user of <br />24 Orange County parks and a resident. He said the master plan specifically mentions more trails, <br />25 greenways, and connectivity between parks. He said these plans provide benefits for Orange <br />26 County residents and are low cost. He urged the Board to consider those particular benefits <br />27 and to adopt this plan. <br />28 Commissioner Gordon said the last master plan was done in 1988. She said the County <br />29 needs a new master plan in order to get matching grant funds. She said the plan can be <br />30 updated as things move forward. <br />31 She is interested in Twin Creeks Park, and she noted priority number 7 is Twin Creeks <br />32 Park — Phase 2. This Phase 2 actually contains some projects that were contemplated in a past <br />33 bond referendum, and therefore should have priority for completion. She would like to see this <br />34 park moved up on the priority list, and she asked the Board to remember Twin Creeks Park - <br />35 Phase 2 when considering which park projects should be completed first. <br />36 She noted that this approval is only for the table listing all of the projects, and there <br />37 should be an understanding that this list will updated as things move forward. <br />38 Commissioner Gordon referred to the OUTBOARD comments on the master plan, and <br />39 asked if this board had some part in the continuing updating of the plan. <br />40 David Stancil said the OUTBOARD made some good points, several of which are <br />41 incorporated into the document. He said these are all items that are valid points but many are <br />42 sub -plan level and can be incorporated at an operational level. <br />43 Commissioner Gordon said she thinks it is very important to go ahead with this master <br />44 plan to give an overall set of guidelines. She said parts of it can be changed during the CIP <br />45 process if priorities change. <br />46 David Stancil recognized the staff members who helped with this plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.