Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2015 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
1/16/2015 3:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-22-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br />1 Chair Jacobs said the question is whether this should be requested, and it would be <br />2 good to have some date and maps to consider. <br />3 Commissioner McKee asked if there is any representation for areas outside of those ETJ <br />4 areas or anywhere else that is somewhat controlled by Chapel Hill. <br />5 Craig Benedict said presently there are either ETJ representatives for those limited <br />6 areas or JPA/Transition area representatives. <br />7 Craig Benedict said he has met with participants and representatives of ETJ and joint <br />8 planning areas so that they can get the perspective of what their role is. <br />9 He agreed that a map would be good. <br />10 Chair Jacobs said he appreciates Craig Benedict's willingness to help train and orient <br />11 people. He said an area like Northwoods can feel very isolated and unrepresented. He said the <br />12 residents do not know where to turn, but they are being impacted by a government in which they <br />13 have a limited voting stake. He said this was a key issue in joint planning, and the <br />14 Commissioners wanted to make sure to be a voice for those people who would eventually be <br />15 annexed. <br />16 Commissioner Gordon said she remembered the passionate way the people in the ETJ <br />17 had reacted to their status in the past, and the fact that this negative reaction provided a lot of <br />18 the impetus for the cooperative joint planning. She said, in general, perhaps the language <br />19 should be strengthened in favor of joint planning as opposed to ETJ. She said a joint planning <br />20 agreement solves a lot of issues. <br />21 Craig Benedict said this will be fine tuned and brought back in February. He asked if the <br />22 Board would be interested in having a joint process with the municipality. <br />23 Chair Jacobs answered yes. <br />24 <br />25 5. Closed Session <br />26 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner McKee to go <br />27 into closed session at 9:58 p.m. for the purpose below: <br />28 <br />29 "To discuss matters related to the location or expansion of industries or other businesses in the <br />30 area served by the public body, including agreement on a tentative list of economic <br />31 development incentives that may be offered by the public body in negotiations," NCGS § 143- <br />32 318.11(a)(4). <br />33 <br />34 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />35 <br />36 RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION <br />37 <br />38 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br />39 reconvene into regular session at 10:35pm. <br />40 <br />41 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />42 <br />43 ADJOURNMENT <br />44 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to <br />45 adjourn the meeting at 10:35pm. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.