Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-22-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2015 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
1/16/2015 3:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/22/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-22-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I contribution impacts the 20 Year Cost Benefit Comparison. <br />2 Ken Pennoyer said, in looking back at the last presentation, he noticed that the numbers <br />3 used for student generation were wildly different than the numbers being used by County <br />4 staff. He said the Town was estimating 105 students based on the 2007 student generation <br />5 numbers for multifamily housing. He said the County estimate was 450 new students, and this <br />6 is significantly higher. He said this was based on the housing generation for all different types <br />7 of housing. He said a new, preliminary set of numbers have just been received for 2014. He <br />8 reviewed the slides on these numbers and said the figures are broken down by areas and <br />9 house size. He said the estimate, based on these new numbers, is a range of 179 to 284 new <br />10 students. <br />11 Ken Pennoyer said the difference from the initial presentation is a suggested approach <br />12 where the town provides an annual project report that will form the basis of the County's budget <br />13 decision making with regard to funding. <br />14 Commissioner Pelissier said there is a project being submitted by Chapel Hill tomorrow <br />15 at the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) meeting. She said is a project for over $2 <br />16 million for the intersection of Ephesus Church and Fordham Boulevard. She would like to know <br />17 what other transportation projects might come from DOT money. She would also like to know <br />18 how this project being looked at by the MPO plays into the Ephesus Fordham project. <br />19 Ken Pennoyer said there is a $2.1 million project being submitted to the DOT, and this <br />20 would actually reduce the $8.8 million in costs associated with roadway projects. He said this <br />21 would come in the form of a reimbursement in 2018, so the full amount would still be borrowed <br />22 initially, and then the $2 million would be an early redemption to reduce the overall cost. <br />23 Commissioner Pelissier asked if there are any other projects in the MPO plan that relate <br />24 to road improvements in this area. <br />25 Dwight Bassett said there is an additional request related to studying a bridge that <br />26 connects over the wetlands between Eastgate and Whole Foods, but there are no other <br />27 requests related to roads. <br />28 Commissioner Pelissier referred to the slide on cost benefit comparisons. She asked if <br />29 staff had calculated how much of a property tax increase would be needed to close the gap <br />30 Ken Pennoyer said it would be in the range of a 1 to 2 cent increase. He said this would <br />31 have to happen in the early part of the project, as it would take awhile for enough development <br />32 to happen to create the revenue; however, he said the plan was to use fund balance in the debt <br />33 management fund in order to fill any initial gap. <br />34 Commissioner Gordon acknowledged Commissioner Elect Mia Burroughs, two members <br />35 of the Chapel Hill Town Council, George Cianciolo and Maria Palmer, and Chapel Hill Mayor <br />36 Mark Kleinschmidt. She asked about the economic impact analysis that was mentioned as part <br />37 of the annual report. <br />38 Ken Pennoyer said staff would look at what was being built and the impact with regard to <br />39 retail sales, employment, and basic increases in value and property tax. <br />40 Commissioner Gordon asked if an analysis like this is available now based on the <br />41 figures that are known. <br />42 Ken Pennoyer said a large cost benefit analysis has been done for the overall <br />43 project. He said this is a fairly large undertaking, and once you get beyond 10 years it is pretty <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.