Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-19-1995 - X-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 12-19-95
>
Agenda - 12-19-1995 - X-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2015 8:50:29 AM
Creation date
1/14/2015 8:50:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/19/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19951219
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
RES-1995-064 Resolution Directing Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Urban Area Regional Bicycle Plan be Used as a Guideline in the Development of a Bicycle Component to the Transportation Element of the OC Comprehensive Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"6 <br /> L INTRODUCTION <br /> A Bicycle Route Suitability Study has been proposed to the Orange County Planning Board as a <br /> first step in the process of implementing Orange County's portion of the Durham-Chapel Hill- <br /> Carrboro (DCHC) Metropolitan Planning Organization's 1993 Regional Bicycle Plan(see Map <br /> 1). The purpose of any bicycle suitability study is to estimate the amount of interaction between <br /> vehicular and bicycle traffic along bicycle routes. By determining which bicycle routes are bicycle <br /> compatible and those which are not, the Bicycle Route Suitability Study will assist Orange County <br /> to plan for the provision of comprehensive bicycling facilities within the County and also to <br /> recommend amendments to the DCHC Regional Bicycle Plan. <br /> A Pilot Project for this study (see Appendix A for an explanation of the SRI method and the <br /> results)used the Suitability Rating Index(SRI) methodology as described in the 1993 DCHC <br /> Bicycle Plan for the analysis of bicycle routes in Orange County. This method was not used <br /> because; a)the SRI formula required several changes to adapt it for use in the rural portions of <br /> Orange County, and b) the North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT) <br /> recommended the use of Alex Sorton's methodology. NCDOT recommended Sorton's method <br /> because of the predominance of SRI ratings that indicated an excessively high level of interaction <br /> between automobiles and bicycles. This report describes the Sorton methodology and presents <br /> the results of applying it to planned bicycle routes in Orange County . <br /> The methodology developed by Alex Sorton of the Northwestern University Traffic Institute in <br /> Evanston, Illinois is, in our opinion, a more direct measure of bicycle/automobile interaction. <br /> This methodology does not rely on subjective evaluations of pavement and location conditions. <br /> In addition, the formula is straight-forward and required no adjustments for use in the rural areas <br /> of Orange County. This method is an evaluation of bicyclist stress as determined by three <br /> variables: the amount of traffic, width of the road, and the speed limit of a given road segment. <br /> The final results, or overall stress level ratings, also refer to the bicyclist skill level recommended <br /> for the safe use on that particular road segment. <br /> EL METHODOLOGY <br /> Sorton's methodology is described in "Determining Road Compatibility for Bicyclists," PRO <br /> BIKE/PRO WALK 1994. Please see Appendix B for a copy of this report. <br /> A. Study Area-Bicycle routes analyzed in this project have been taken from the DCHC <br /> Regional Bicycle Plan and NCDOT's TIP Project No. E-2913 (see Map 2). The study <br /> area also includes those routes designated by the Town of Hillsborough for bicycle and <br /> joint bicycle and pedestrian use(see Map 3). The 124 road segments were divided into <br /> two groups -- 90 rural and 34 urban--based on the presence of curb and gutter, speed <br /> limit (45 mph and under suggested an urban character), and location(segments within or <br /> near town limits with the other urban qualities were considered urban). <br /> 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.