Orange County NC Website
1 <br /> r <br /> IVY <br /> (k <br /> JUMM21 <br /> Table ES-7 <br /> Technical Risk <br /> System Strengths Weaknesses <br /> System 1 The collection and processing system • The use of the variable rate bag/tag <br /> has been proven more effectively than approach may make a collection ban <br /> that described in System 2. difficult to enforce. <br /> System 2 • Wet/dry collection and processing <br /> systems have a less proven history of <br /> operation than those described in <br /> System 3. <br /> Co-collection vehicles are less proven <br /> than vehicles used in Systems 1 and 3. <br /> • Inclusion of yard waste in the "wet" <br /> stream bags could lead to higher <br /> potential for contamination of organics <br /> than in Systems 1 and 3. <br /> • Potential problems with start-up, <br /> reliability, and end markets for <br /> organics composting systems using <br /> "wet" materials give System 2 <br /> additional risks. <br /> • Debagging of wastes could represent <br /> greater technical problems for System <br /> 2. <br /> • Enforcement of procedures at <br /> convenience centers may be most <br /> difficult in this sytem, due to the need <br /> to separate wet and dry materials. <br /> System 3 • The collection and processing system <br /> has been proven more effectively than <br /> that describer) in System 2. <br /> • The technical effectiveness of System 3 <br /> collection has already been tested <br /> through the current system. <br /> NOR/K\WP\10790\RPKDL OO7.WP ES-I 1 09105 <br />